Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Mosè Giordano writes: > 2017-01-10 10:49 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > > You got me. I hoped that no one would have noticed that I didn't move > the manual for 11.89 there, before the next release ;-) I can keep a secret ;-) >> One other thing I didn't check is if my

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

2017-01-10 10:49 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > Hi Mosè, > > Mosè Giordano writes: > >> 2017-01-10 9:05 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : >>> I built the manual as .pdf and some TOC entries are misplaced (excerpt >>> attached). I have texinfo version 2016-08-16.19

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano writes: > 2017-01-10 9:05 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : >> I built the manual as .pdf and some TOC entries are misplaced (excerpt >> attached). I have texinfo version 2016-08-16.19 here. Can you >> reproduce this? TIA. > > Do you mean that some

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano writes: > 2017-01-09 10:39 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : >> >> Thanks for the clarification. What do you think about the change >> attached? > > Thanks for taking care of this, your changes look good to me. Thanks for checking, >

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Arash, 2017-01-10 9:05 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > I built the manual as .pdf and some TOC entries are misplaced (excerpt > attached). I have texinfo version 2016-08-16.19 here. Can you > reproduce this? TIA. Do you mean that some page numbers go outside the margins? Yes, I

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Arash, 2017-01-09 10:39 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > Mosč Giordano writes: > >> 2017-01-08 19:49 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > >>> Before I write some text: If I get it right, one can have >>> (package-initialize) in his .emacs

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Mosè Giordano writes: > 2017-01-08 19:49 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : >> Before I write some text: If I get it right, one can have >> (package-initialize) in his .emacs and then the sentence from "1.3 Quick >> Start" does not apply anymore. Is this correct?

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

2017-01-08 19:49 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > Hi Mosè, > > Mosè Giordano writes: > >> 2017-01-08 19:13 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : >>> I suggest that we also >>> emphasize more in the official documentation that ELPA is the preferred

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano writes: > 2017-01-08 19:13 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : >> I suggest that we also >> emphasize more in the official documentation that ELPA is the preferred >> way to go. WDYT? > > The installation section of the manual starts with >

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Arash, 2017-01-08 19:13 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati : > I suggest that we also > emphasize more in the official documentation that ELPA is the preferred > way to go. WDYT? The installation section of the manual starts with The simplest way of installing AUCTeX is

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano writes: > If no one has objections, I will *not* distribute a Windows package > for AUCTeX 11.90. +1. > My idea is also to make it clearer on the website that the preferred > way to install AUCTeX is through GNU ELPA, independently from the > operating

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi, 2017-01-07 23:16 GMT+01:00 : > Regarding the package distribution. I'm a Windows 32-bit user (both Windows > and I are 32-bit), so let me understand: as long as I update AucTeX via > package-list-packages, I'll have no problems? That's correct. I want to push forward the

Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Hi Mosè, Parenthetical thank you, first: I've noticed that the latest AucTeX version has a new indentation and filling system for displaymath environments that is simply fantastic. Thank you all developers for this! Regarding the package distribution. I'm a Windows 32-bit user (both

[AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows

Dear all, in particular Windows users, I'm testing the release process, in view of the upcoming release of AUCTeX 11.90. At every release, one of the most annoying part is to adapt the Makefile for distributing an AUCTeX package for Windows. For example, I have to adjust the Makefile for the