* Mosè Giordano (2014-07-19) writes:
> 2014-07-19 21:06 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano :
>> The Windows Emacs binary is downloaded even if $WEMACS is already
>> there. Probably I'll add a test to the Makefile before
>>
>> test -f $(WBUILDDIR)/emacs-$(WEMACSVER)-bin-i386.zip
>>
>> to avoid this.
>
>
2014-07-19 21:06 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano :
> The Windows Emacs binary is downloaded even if $WEMACS is already
> there. Probably I'll add a test to the Makefile before
>
> test -f $(WBUILDDIR)/emacs-$(WEMACSVER)-bin-i386.zip
>
> to avoid this.
I stand corrected - the Windows Emacs package is
2014-07-19 14:41 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano :
> Hi Ralf!
>
> 2014-07-19 12:41 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli :
>> * Tassilo Horn (2014-07-19) writes:
>>
Right, any time schedule for 11.88?
>>>
>>> Basically, now would be fine with me. What's currently missing is
>>> someone who is able to build the windo
>> "Mos" == Mos writes:
> Hi Uwe,
> 2014-07-18 22:58 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>> Please don't exclude xemacs, realistically now I have nothing to
>> offer than a polite request.
> It would be great if you could use the git version of AUCTeX. we
> really need feedback from daily
>> "Mos" == Mos writes:
> Hi Uwe,
> 2014-07-18 22:58 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>> Please don't exclude xemacs, realistically now I have nothing to
>> offer than a polite request.
> It would be great if you could use the git version of AUCTeX. we
> really need feedback from daily
Hi Uwe,
2014-07-18 22:58 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> Please don't exclude xemacs, realistically now I have nothing to
> offer than a polite request.
It would be great if you could use the git version of AUCTeX. we
really need feedback from daily XEmacs users ;-)
This week thanks to Ikume we fixed s
Hi Ralf!
2014-07-19 12:41 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli :
> * Tassilo Horn (2014-07-19) writes:
>
>>> Right, any time schedule for 11.88?
>>
>> Basically, now would be fine with me. What's currently missing is
>> someone who is able to build the windows package. I hope that Ralf
>> reads this anytime so
* Tassilo Horn (2014-07-19) writes:
>> Right, any time schedule for 11.88?
>
> Basically, now would be fine with me. What's currently missing is
> someone who is able to build the windows package. I hope that Ralf
> reads this anytime soon.
I read it. (c:
The nice thing about the Windows packa
Uwe Brauer writes:
Hi Uwe,
>>> The reason why I am asking this, is the fact that I am now convinced
>>> that 11.87 has some important improvement over 11.84
>
>> We very much hope so! And the git head has many improvements over
>> 11.87, too.
>
> Now I am confused. You just stat
Mosè Giordano writes:
Hi Mosè,
>> It would be very, very, very valuable if someone with better makefile
>> foo than me would restructure the AUCTeX Git repo according to the
>> restrictions of the ELPA machinery, so that if fact the auctex ELPA
>> branch and the official AUCTeX git head were the
10 matches
Mail list logo
