Hi AUCTeX developers,
Some time ago, support for various viewers were added to tex.el. Part
of those changes were already present in tex-jp.el, so support for some
viewers are devided between the two files now.
How about integrating support for viewers common to the two files into
tex.el? Take
Hi Ikumi,
2016-04-10 10:20 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita :
> Hi AUCTeX developers,
>
> Some time ago, support for various viewers were added to tex.el. Part
> of those changes were already present in tex-jp.el, so support for some
> viewers are devided between the two files now.
>
> How about integrating
Hi Mosè,
> Thanks for your patch, looks good to me. Could you please provide a
> commit patch with the ChangeLog entry as commit message?
Sorry, I'm not sure how "commit patch" should look like. Actually, I'm
using mercurial with hg-git plugin, so my patch may lack the detail the
real git would
Hi Ikumi,
2016-04-10 12:53 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita :
> Hi Mosè,
>
>> Thanks for your patch, looks good to me. Could you please provide a
>> commit patch with the ChangeLog entry as commit message?
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure how "commit patch" should look like.
I mean a patch for a commit produced wit
Hi Mosè,
>> Actually, I'm
>> using mercurial with hg-git plugin, so my patch may lack the detail the
>> real git would append.
> Ok, fine. According to http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/300 `hg email
> --git' is the Mercurial equivalent of `git format-patch'.
Thank you for your kind instruction.
>>> "Ikumi" == Ikumi Keita writes:
>>> Actually, I'm
>>> using mercurial with hg-git plugin, so my patch may lack the detail the
>>> real git would append.
>> Ok, fine. According to http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/300 `hg email
>> --git' is the Mercurial equivalent of `git format-
2016-04-10 16:52 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita :
> Hi Mosè,
>
>>> Actually, I'm
>>> using mercurial with hg-git plugin, so my patch may lack the detail the
>>> real git would append.
>
>> Ok, fine. According to http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/300 `hg email
>> --git' is the Mercurial equivalent of `git forma
> Thanks, I installed your patch. For the future, it would be great if
> you were able to find a way to provide patches like those created by
> format-patch (including commit information: author, date, message,
> etc...): that would be much easier for us and also better for you as
> it avoids erro
Hi Mosè, hi Ikumi,
Mosè Giordano writes:
> 2016-04-10 10:20 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita :
>> Hi AUCTeX developers,
>>
>> Some time ago, support for various viewers were added to tex.el. Part
>> of those changes were already present in tex-jp.el, so support for some
>> viewers are devided between the
Hi Arash, thanks for your comment. Sorry for being late to reply, since
I don't subscribe to auctex-devel. I found your message on the web
archive http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/ .
> Is there a particular reason why the remainder in tex-jp.el
> shouldn't move into tex.el as well?
Hi Ikumi,
to be honest I was surprised to discover there are programs like
TeXShop and TeXworks, that are other *TeX editors. I thought that the
builtin PDF viewer would have been used, but actually TeXworks
segfaults on my system if I try to open a PDF file with it (probably
it tries to open the
Hi Mosè,
> Even if the builtin viewer of another TeX editor were launched, I
> don't see how this can be useful to AUCTeX users.
Perhaps so. The lines of TeXworks and TeXShop in tex-jp.el may be
redundant. I won't object if you remove them.
> I thought that the builtin PDF viewer would have be
Hi Ikumi,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi Arash, thanks for your comment. Sorry for being late to reply, since
> I don't subscribe to auctex-devel. I found your message on the web
> archive http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/ .
I read this list also through Gmane, I use nntp://news.gmane
13 matches
Mail list logo
