Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Ivan,
You're welcome. Feel free to submit a code-only patch with the few
modifications we've just discussed. I'm going to apply it right
away, and beat you to write the docs in the next week. ;-)
I hope you do! Then I don't have to do it. :-)
Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org writes:
I hope you do! Then I don't have to do it. :-) Here's my version, as
well as a patch for the documentation about ChkTeX. A possible
changelog for it is below:
Thank you, I've committed both patches.
Oh, we've overlooked something. You've set the *global*
On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org writes:
I hope you do! Then I don't have to do it. :-) Here's my version, as
well as a patch for the documentation about ChkTeX. A possible
changelog for it is below:
Thank you, I've committed both
On Jan 24, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Ivan,
[I've added the list back to Cc.]
Sorry. It seems no matter how hard I try I always forget to do that. :-/
+(defvar TeX-output-mode-map
+ (let ((map
Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Ivan,
In my opinion, jumping to the previous error is more important in
output buffers than toggling TeX-PDF-mode. The latter has nothing
to do with debugging the output.
I agree, but it isn't supported. If you mean that I should reserve
the
On Jan 24, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Ivan,
In my opinion, jumping to the previous error is more important in
output buffers than toggling TeX-PDF-mode. The latter has nothing
to do with debugging the output.
I
On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Ralf Angeli ang...@caeruleus.net wrote:
* Ivan Andrus (2013-01-21) writes:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org writes:
I just want to add that XEmacs doesn't have `special-mode', so you'll
have to make
Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Ivan,
Here is my first version of the patch. Any comments welcome.
Particularly I'm not sure my placement (at the end of tex-buf.el) is
right, nor that the ChangeLog is detailed enough.
Looks good to me.
What's missing is some user
I'm often annoyed that the TeX output buffer (i.e. *file output*) doesn't
inherit from special-mode. In particular, I want to use q to quit and g to
refresh (i.e. run LaTeX again). Also, since editing it doesn't make much
sense, using space and backspace for navigation can be nice. Below I
Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
I'm often annoyed that the TeX output buffer (i.e. *file output*)
doesn't inherit from special-mode. In particular, I want to use q to
quit and g to refresh (i.e. run LaTeX again). Also, since editing it
doesn't make much sense, using space and
Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org writes:
Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
I'm often annoyed that the TeX output buffer (i.e. *file output*)
doesn't inherit from special-mode. In particular, I want to use q to
quit and g to refresh (i.e. run LaTeX again). Also, since editing it
doesn't
On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org writes:
Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com writes:
I'm often annoyed that the TeX output buffer (i.e. *file output*)
doesn't inherit from special-mode. In particular, I want to use q to
quit and g to
* Ivan Andrus (2013-01-21) writes:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org writes:
I just want to add that XEmacs doesn't have `special-mode', so you'll
have to make some extra work to get a consistent behavior across all
kinds and versions
13 matches
Mail list logo
