Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-03 Thread David Kastrup
Mosè Giordano writes: > Hi Ralf, > > 2014-09-02 20:00 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli : >> * Mosč Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: >> >>> for the release process we should follow the "Distributions" section >>> of the GNU Maintainer guide, right? I can build and sign all >>> tarballs, including XEmacs and Wi

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-03 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Mosè Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: > 2014-09-02 20:00 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli : >> >> Hm, I haven't had trouble with the command and I've been using Debian >> all along. But perhaps they changed the default shell since the last >> AUCTeX release? Did the command fail in your case? > > Yes, the r

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-02 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Ralf, 2014-09-02 20:00 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli : > * Mosč Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: > >> for the release process we should follow the "Distributions" section >> of the GNU Maintainer guide, right? I can build and sign all >> tarballs, including XEmacs and Windows ones, but who will send the

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-02 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Mosè Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: > for the release process we should follow the "Distributions" section > of the GNU Maintainer guide, right? I can build and sign all > tarballs, including XEmacs and Windows ones, but who will send the > packages to the FTP server? For what is worth, I haven

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-02 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Tassilo and other co-maintainers, for the release process we should follow the "Distributions" section of the GNU Maintainer guide, right? I can build and sign all tarballs, including XEmacs and Windows ones, but who will send the packages to the FTP server? For what is worth, I haven't gone

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-08-06 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, > how about the first week of September to roll the new release? We > would have another month of testing. Fine with me! Bye, Tassilo >> Mosè Giordano writes: >> I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be compiled without errors

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-08-01 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi all, how about the first week of September to roll the new release? We would have another month of testing. Bye, Mosè 2014-07-18 7:59 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn : > Mosè Giordano writes: > >>> I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be >>> compiled without errors, but I do

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-17 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: >> I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be >> compiled without errors, but I don't use Windows. > > I confirm I succeed in building the XEmacs package, using XEmacs > 21.4.22. Perfect. > I've just pushed to the repository a change which removes .cv

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-17 Thread Mosè Giordano
2014-07-14 9:50 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano : > I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be > compiled without errors, but I don't use Windows. I confirm I succeed in building the XEmacs package, using XEmacs 21.4.22. I've just pushed to the repository a change which removes .cvs

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-14 Thread Mosè Giordano
2014-07-14 8:31 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn : > Mosè Giordano writes: > > Hi! > What do you think? >>> >>> Sounds good to me, but I haven't been following the development in >>> detail. So I don't know if there are problems that need to be >>> addressed first. >> >> I meant to address other maint

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-13 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: Hi! >>> What do you think? >> >> Sounds good to me, but I haven't been following the development in >> detail. So I don't know if there are problems that need to be >> addressed first. > > I meant to address other maintainers, sorry for not having been clear > :-) Yes, it

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-13 Thread Mosè Giordano
2014-07-13 19:15 GMT+02:00 Ken Brown : > On 7/13/2014 12:05 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote: >> What do you think? > > > Sounds good to me, but I haven't been following the development in detail. > So I don't know if there are problems that need to be addressed first. I meant to address other maintainers,

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-13 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/13/2014 12:05 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote: Hi Ken, 2014-07-13 17:16 GMT+02:00 Ken Brown : On 7/13/2014 6:20 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote: For AUCTeX there is currently no release plan Isn't it about time to plan a new release? It seems that there's been quite a bit of development since the la

[AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-13 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Ken, 2014-07-13 17:16 GMT+02:00 Ken Brown : > On 7/13/2014 6:20 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote: >> >> For AUCTeX there is currently no release plan > > > Isn't it about time to plan a new release? It seems that there's been quite > a bit of development since the last one. I tend to agree. During la