Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-03 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Mosè Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: 2014-09-02 20:00 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli ang...@caeruleus.net: Hm, I haven't had trouble with the command and I've been using Debian all along. But perhaps they changed the default shell since the last AUCTeX release? Did the command fail in your case?

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-03 Thread David Kastrup
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: Hi Ralf, 2014-09-02 20:00 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli ang...@caeruleus.net: * Mosč Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: for the release process we should follow the Distributions section of the GNU Maintainer guide, right? I can build and sign all tarballs,

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-02 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Mosè Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: for the release process we should follow the Distributions section of the GNU Maintainer guide, right? I can build and sign all tarballs, including XEmacs and Windows ones, but who will send the packages to the FTP server? For what is worth, I haven't

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-09-02 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Ralf, 2014-09-02 20:00 GMT+02:00 Ralf Angeli ang...@caeruleus.net: * Mosč Giordano (2014-09-02) writes: for the release process we should follow the Distributions section of the GNU Maintainer guide, right? I can build and sign all tarballs, including XEmacs and Windows ones, but who

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-08-06 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: Hi Mosè, how about the first week of September to roll the new release? We would have another month of testing. Fine with me! Bye, Tassilo Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be compiled

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-08-01 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi all, how about the first week of September to roll the new release? We would have another month of testing. Bye, Mosè 2014-07-18 7:59 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org: Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be compiled without

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-18 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be compiled without errors, but I don't use Windows. I confirm I succeed in building the XEmacs package, using XEmacs 21.4.22. Perfect. I've just pushed to the repository a change which

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-17 Thread Mosè Giordano
2014-07-14 9:50 GMT+02:00 Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org: I should be able to build the XEmacs package, now that it can be compiled without errors, but I don't use Windows. I confirm I succeed in building the XEmacs package, using XEmacs 21.4.22. I've just pushed to the repository a change which

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-14 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: Hi! What do you think? Sounds good to me, but I haven't been following the development in detail. So I don't know if there are problems that need to be addressed first. I meant to address other maintainers, sorry for not having been clear :-) Yes,

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-14 Thread Mosè Giordano
2014-07-14 8:31 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org: Mosè Giordano m...@gnu.org writes: Hi! What do you think? Sounds good to me, but I haven't been following the development in detail. So I don't know if there are problems that need to be addressed first. I meant to address other

[AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-13 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Ken, 2014-07-13 17:16 GMT+02:00 Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu: On 7/13/2014 6:20 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote: For AUCTeX there is currently no release plan Isn't it about time to plan a new release? It seems that there's been quite a bit of development since the last one. I tend to agree.

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-13 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/13/2014 12:05 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote: Hi Ken, 2014-07-13 17:16 GMT+02:00 Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu: On 7/13/2014 6:20 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote: For AUCTeX there is currently no release plan Isn't it about time to plan a new release? It seems that there's been quite a bit of

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Plan for a new release? [Was: preview.sty included in GNU ELPA problematic]

2014-07-13 Thread Mosè Giordano
2014-07-13 19:15 GMT+02:00 Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu: On 7/13/2014 12:05 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote: What do you think? Sounds good to me, but I haven't been following the development in detail. So I don't know if there are problems that need to be addressed first. I meant to address other