Hi Uwe,
Uwe Brauer writes:
> It seems that my last patch did not take care of a recent change in
> auctex master, so I pulled and applied my change again.
>
> I send both the patch in HG and just in case in git format. I did not
> modify the Makefile so far, since I don't know whether that patch
> 2016-08-13 17:25 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> Ok, fine, please notify us here when the process is complete.
> I used the git one just because it was there, but if I remember well I
> was able to use a Mercurial one in the past, right?
Yes you did git has an option for mercurial when
2016-08-13 17:25 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>
>> Hi Uwe,
>> 2016-08-13 16:06 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>
>> Thank you for your contribution. A few comments:
>
>> 1) first of all, did you sign the copyright papers? We can't accept
>> this file before you do so
>
> Not yet, I wanted to
> Hi Uwe,
> 2016-08-13 16:06 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
> Thank you for your contribution. A few comments:
> 1) first of all, did you sign the copyright papers? We can't accept
> this file before you do so
Not yet, I wanted to be sure that the contribution turns out to be
useful. I
Hi Uwe,
2016-08-13 16:06 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer :
>
> It seems that my last patch did not take care of a recent change in
> auctex master, so I pulled and applied my change again.
>
> I send both the patch in HG and just in case in git format. I did not
> modify the Makefile so far, since I don't kn
It seems that my last patch did not take care of a recent change in
auctex master, so I pulled and applied my change again.
I send both the patch in HG and just in case in git format. I did not
modify the Makefile so far, since I don't know whether that patch will
be accepted.
Uwe
# HG change
