Re: Expanding AUCTeX's Math Minor Mode

2023-05-04 Thread Arash Esbati
Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: > Looks nice. Thanks for looking at this. > It is basically a good idea. Let's hope that there are volunteers who > make new entries in a suitable form for AUCTeX. :-) Yes, that would be great. And that Someoneā„¢ could also adjust the entries in

Re: Expanding AUCTeX's Math Minor Mode

2023-05-04 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: > after the discussion in this thread[1] reg. completion for math symbols, > I was thinking if we should expand AUCTeX's math minor mode for other > packages than AMSMATH. I played with it briefly and I think for > wasysym, the following change does the

Expanding AUCTeX's Math Minor Mode

2023-05-02 Thread Arash Esbati
Hi all, after the discussion in this thread[1] reg. completion for math symbols, I was thinking if we should expand AUCTeX's math minor mode for other packages than AMSMATH. I played with it briefly and I think for wasysym, the following change does the trick. --8<---cut