Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions

Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions When the original topic creator asks "why x can hurt y", I think he's generally asking "why is x super-effective against y?".Short answer for almost all of them: because reasons. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/

Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions

Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions I'll take a crack at some of these:1: why fighting and insect can hit shadow.Shadow is not the same as ghost. Shadow is the same thing basically as dark in Pokemon. That is to say, dark (of heart), or evil. Not ghostly. Standard

Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions

Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions 1: why fighting and insect can hit shadow.no idea2: why magic doesn't effect undeadum, maybe because it's not classic magic. ya know lightning bolts and broomsticks, with manamon pointing wands at other manamon and growling, roaring

Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions

Re: Logical problem in manamon and some other questions 1: why fighting and insect can hit shadow.no idea2: why magic did not effect undeadum, maybe because it's not classic magic. ya know lightning bolts and broomsticks, with manamon pointing wands at other manamon and growling, roaring

Logical problem in manamon and some other questions

Logical problem in manamon and some other questions Hi! it's more anoying Octoross! and some more damn Manamon 1! I have some questions about type efective and not efective in manamon: 1: why fighting and insect can hit shadow. 2: why magic did not effect undead 3: why stone can hit air?4