Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
@14 yeah that's true. Companies need a legal definition of accessible or else they won't do it.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/468578/#p468578
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
Oh. I'm not saying they aren't lazy, or at least there web team isn't. This is just simply saying that legally speaking, they do not necessarily have to. They just need to meet the legal standard for accessible w
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
@12 then why can't dominos use the WCAG?
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/467995/#p467995
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cg
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
I feel the need to correct some issues here. First, there are indeed no clear "federal" rules. This is important. The WCAG is a private set of guidelines, not a legally binding set of guidelines. The law has far from
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
@10 they probably regretted that decision now.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/467458/#p467458
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
I wonder if court costs and the general trend of how this case is playing out is making some of the execs at DOminos wonder if it wouldn't of been cheaper and faster to put in a few accessibility fixes? As someone p
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
Good Lord people, is it really that hard to make your website accessible? Certainly not harder than going to court to settle an argument, and it’s more worth it to make your website accessible than to go through the trouble of
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
exactly. @8 totaly agree with you. there is already the WCAG so devs won't get lost. I mean its just labeling buttons and adding ALT text.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/467057/#p467057
--
Audiogames-refl
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
Good Lord people, is it really that hard to make your website accessible? Certainly not harder than going to court to settle an argument, and it’s more worth it to make your website accessible van to go through the trouble of
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
@3 i dshare the same hope.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/467041/#p467041
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
@5 what I said.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/466874/#p466874
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
@3:The hope (or not depending on who actually wins this case...), is that it will set a precedent. These kinds of laws change when two entities face off in a court battle - and the ruling that is handed down effects similar
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
No clear rules for accessibility? Rofl I'm laughing here. Come on, there's the WCAG. I highly doubt that the laywers in that case are not aware of the WCAG. If they're not aware of the WCAG, then they are horrib
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
I could be wrong but I thought Domino’s also said something like our website doesn't need to be accessible because you can call or some bull. Wouldn't it be more of a win if the supreme court agreed with the rulin
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
I could be wrong but I thought Domino’s also said something like our website doesn't need to be accessible because you can call or some bull. I will also have to read the article because I thought the blind person won the
Re: Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
well, they are a bit diplomatic, or rather, hypocritical, with these two contradictory statements:Attorneys for Domino’s, backed by a range of business groups, had argued that the ADA does not apply to online platforms that
Supreme Court hands victory to blind man who sued Domino’s
hi, so the supreme court has handed down the decision. It basically said that this case must go to a trial court. full story herewhat do you guys think about this decision?
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/466791/#p466791
17 matches
Mail list logo