Volume steps are 0-100 (0.5dB) in latest 6.5 betas.
--
Patrick Dixon
www.at-tunes.co.uk
Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90
View this thread:
Pat Farrell;132936 Wrote:
No need to be snotty. It is about throughput.
I use wireless for my Squeezeboxes that I use for causal
listening. For my audiophile system, there is a wire.
OK, sorry :-). For a moment I was worried you had fallen into the
voodoo audiophile camp...
Personally
Hmm. Thank you for this, Nikhil. If that is the case, since I've
never had any problems with iTunes provided its error correction is
on, I think I might be sticking with it. I am quite curious to know,
though, what is thought to be sub par about it.
On 1 Sep 2006, at 21:19, Nikhil wrote:
Glad to hear you guys with the expensive systems are enjoying the sound
of the SB3. When some of you move up to the Transporter in your main
system, you can then use the SB3 in the bedroom, kitchen, or garage.
It'd really be great if the Transporter DAC is good enough to allow you
guys to
highdudgeon;132794 Wrote:
In a way, it saves money.
Yah - ditch the CD player, the DAC, and the preamp. If you can sell
your current components, the Transporter could pay for itself.
--
Pale Blue Ego
Pale Blue Ego's
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817
Question:
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817
Question:
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19817
Question:
highdudgeon;132794 Wrote:
I give up -- reading, thinking, talking, etc, have all brought me to the
conclusion that a one box solution is the way to go. Pricey, maybe too
pricey, but it's all there, in one box, it looks nice, I can take it
overseas, I don't need a line stage or other
