egd;211022 Wrote:
Now that you know it is off, does it sound better?
lol :) well actually, my Transporter is still on its way, shipping in.
just getting info.
I should have said: Transporter is gonna be wired ;-)
--
Heimiko
Analog modded SB3 - M1000i - tube buffer - M1000i -
Did this feature ever get added to the Transporter?
--
frankg
frankg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9968
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28259
amey01;211286 Wrote:
STOP STOP STOP!!! Please.
Before we start adding even more features to the Squeezebox, let's just
get what we've got working - and working properly.
FF and REWIND that works as well (not better - just as well) as a
circa 1982 CD player would be a start!
Ain't
JJZolx;211289 Wrote:
Ain't gonna happen. The architecture just isn't cut out for it.
Why? Because the Squeezebox is streaming the songs?
--
Nostromo
Nostromo's Profile:
Nostromo;211293 Wrote:
Why? Because the Squeezebox is streaming the songs?
Yeah. And the roundabout way that a basic command gets to the
Squeezebox - from the IR sensor, through the Squeezebox, sent over the
network to the SlimServer, then sent back over the network to the
Squeezebox. The
amey01;211286 Wrote:
FF and REWIND that works as well (not better - just as well) as a
circa 1982 CD player would be a start!
Rewind? Please be kind, rewind?
I'd love to see your mythical 1982 CD player. From the Sony site:
On August 31, 1982, an announcement was made in Tokyo that four
pfarrell;211307 Wrote:
Aside from the history, why would you want a rewind function?
The only button on my SqueezeBox remote that I use is Play
LOL - cute. Be that as it may, I can think of a thousand times when I
wanted to rewind through a track I was playing for [insert reason].
Whether
elmstreet;207589 Wrote:
I had a little update this morning.
In fact the yet to be announced product would fill a gap between SB3
and Transporter. It seems it would be around $1000.
If this is true, it could be the SB+ with XLR we are all waiting for.
We are? That's news to me.
--
JJZolx
EnochLight wrote:
LOL - cute. Be that as it may, I can think of a thousand times when I
wanted to rewind through a track I was playing for [insert reason].
Whether it was to listen again to the nuance of a particular part of a
track or to show a friend a particular segment of a song without
cliveb;207593 Wrote:
It strikes me that the existing hardware is already fine for the mass
market. The barrier to the Squeezebox becoming a mainstream product is
the backend - the slightly geeky nature of Slimserver
SlimServer was as good as gone the day Logitech bought the company.
and the
So you'll get people that say it's OK audio wise and it's not up to real
audio.
I'll question that assumption because right now, to my ears it sounds
wonderful :)
I have it wired to a pretty revealing system:
InnerSound Eros Mk3 on cone spikes, Active X-over, Bi-amped with
another InnerSound
EvilTed;211322 Wrote:
Now I need to get my mates transporter for a lend and give that a
listen :)
You may never come out of your listening room.
Transporter is heads above the SB3.
I'm still blown away by the improvement over my RWA SB3.
Hope your mates understand your reluctance to
JJZolx;211319 Wrote:
A more plausible scenario is that they'd jump on the bandwagon with
everyone else on the planet and open a digital music store. They might
even distinguish themselves for a short while if they offered lossless
Flac downloads of music that aren't available elsewhere.
erland;211329 Wrote:
The problem here is of course that the music industry wouldn't allow
this unless the FLAC is encrypted and copy protected in some way so it
is impossible to use it on another computer.
Sure they would. Apple has done the hard work by convincing the music
industry that
14 matches
Mail list logo
