SuperQ;251469 Wrote:
If you do the maths, it's not a problem for wifi at all.
24/96 file in wav format is 4.5mbps. A good 802.11g signal (54mbps
signaling) can easily send 20mbps of real data. Not a problem! You
could run 5+ transporters with 24/96 FLAC over wifi. Seriously! Audio
is
The most important difference between the squeeze box and the
transporter is that the transporter has a world clock input. So if you
are using a high-end dac with an world clock output as master you have
very low jitter. You can also connect both and maybe a separate
upsampler to a sepate world
From my experiments I find that if you take the SB3, change the PSU for
a linear one, and use a good enough external DAC (Something with a
highly rated capability for removing jitter)then the result will stand
comparison with some other very good sources. If you don't want 24/96
playback then I
There's been a lot of talk about linear ps for SB. What are people
using?
--
avta
avta's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1860
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41160
konut;251447 Wrote:
So how does it compare to the USB/Vista feed now?
The sound is close to the USB/Vista/DAC feed but (I stress this word
because it's damn close) extreme detail is not there.
Meaning of extreme. Example: One vocal passage I listen to, I can hear
the female vocalist really
jt25741;251451 Wrote:
Adding number 5:
I find the dimest setting to sound the worst, brightest second to best,
and completely off is best of all. This is all through my external
DAC.
Of course, most people on this board will think we are nuts, but this
is where audiophiles post --
SuperQ wrote:
If you do the maths, it's not a problem for wifi at all.
24/96 file in wav format is 4.5mbps. A good 802.11g signal (54mbps
signaling) can easily send 20mbps of real data.
I'd be careful with this.
I've never seen a real 20 mb/s over 11g
While the theory says its fast, and
Hi!
I tried the beta firmware V83, and Wow! realy good !
I have also tried the latest FW V84.. but The Magic and Good things is
gone in this version.
Any news why this FW sounds better?
regards
/mats :-)
--
omega
darrenyeats;251439 Wrote:
Eric,
WAVs take roughly twice the network bandwidth of FLACs. I have no
problems streaming 16 bit WAVs or 24 bit FLACs over my wireless-G
network. Haven't tried a 24 bit WAV but if you do the maths it should
be well within the capacity of even wireless-B.
I
Hi!
The 21 of january -08
we gonna meet Hammers friend at the Royal Institute of Technology to
see if we can track this thing down.
regards
/mats :-)
--
omega
omega's Profile:
mofuv;251477 Wrote:
The most important difference between the squeeze box and the
transporter is that the transporter has a world clock input. So if you
are using a high-end dac with an world clock output as master you have
very low jitter. You can also connect both and maybe a separate
Eric Seaberg;251501 Wrote:
I don't have a problem wireless to my SB3s either, but some people have.
I've spent a lot of time and money on my home network and have it
working GREAT, but not everyone does that. If you run the SERVER and
any playback devices WIRELESS, I can guarantee you WILL
Having googled around for router problems unrelated to slim devices, I
see that certain wireless routers have been known to reboot due to
interference from their own transmitters, and will only work reliably
when stood on end with the arial upright, minimising the area of the
router that is
harmonic wrote:
Thats a very impressiv digital playback system you have there that
system must must cost 4 times as much as the linn akurate cd player.
No wonder it sounds better
Yes, because obviously the more a system costs the better it sounds.
, but the real interresting thing
mofuv;251477 Wrote:
The most important difference between the squeeze box and the
transporter is that the transporter has a world clock input. So if you
are using a high-end dac with an world clock output as master you have
very low jitter. You can also connect both and maybe a separate
Transporter is connected via balanced AES/EBU to the purcell upsampler.
The Ethernet output then links to the dac and from there via balanced
outputs to the A-60 (balanced inputs).
The master clock is connected via BNC to the transporter, the upsamler
and the dac.
--
mofuv
Pat Farrell;251494 Wrote:
SuperQ wrote:
If you do the maths, it's not a problem for wifi at all.
24/96 file in wav format is 4.5mbps. A good 802.11g signal (54mbps
signaling) can easily send 20mbps of real data.
I'd be careful with this.
I've never seen a real 20 mb/s over 11g
That's 15mbps, so I guess you're right, 20mbps may be far too optimal,
but 15mbps is easily possible with 11g only devices.
This is about what I've found. YMMV and all that.
I use 10 to 15 MBs as a ball park and its works fairly well.
Streaming media requires a lot more bandwidth than even
seanadams;250709 Wrote:
A beta firmware update for proper 88.2 KHz support, along with other
fixes, is coming very soon.
Only for Transporter, correct? The sb2/3 hardware doesn't allow 24/96
or 24/88?
--
jmourik
omega;251499 Wrote:
Hi!
I tried the beta firmware V83, and Wow! realy good !
I have also tried the latest FW V84.. but The Magic and Good things is
gone in this version.
Any news why this FW sounds better?
regards
/mats :-)
You might want to try version 84 again. I find it
20 matches
Mail list logo
