mofuv;251477 Wrote: > The most important difference between the squeeze box and the > transporter is that the transporter has a world clock input. So if you > are using a high-end dac with an world clock output as master you have > very low jitter. You can also connect both and maybe a separate > upsampler to a sepate world clock and you will hear the best high end > sound which is currently available, even better than with the best > CD-transport if you have saved the CD's bit correct to HDD e.g with > EAC. > > I am using the transporter with a scarlatti world clock as master, > then a purcell updampler to DSD and a scarlatti dac connected to a > Accuphase A-60. The sound is exceeds by far the one if I am playing > CD's on my Linn Accurate CD player.
Thats a very impressiv digital playback system you have there that system must must cost 4 times as much as the linn akurate cd player. No wonder it sounds better , but the real interresting thing is what is better to you ? more soundstage , more detajl? but what about musicality , what about PRAT . But i totally agree with you that the transporter as a adigital only transport is a aboslute higend component and even better then most other cd transports. -- harmonic ------------------------------------------------------------------------ harmonic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6879 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41160 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
