probedb;395953 Wrote:
.After all they probably paid £1000s for their systems so they know
best right? ;)
Delete systems, insert feet under their Squeezeboxes. :-)
--
mooblie
Martin at 'HeadSpin' (http://www.headspin.plus.com)
mooblie;395973 Wrote:
Hi - nice work! Can I ask where you got the cases please? TIA!
Hi mooblie, and thanks! The cases came from the same place as the kit:
http://www.autocostruire.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=43osCsid=8286673ae990110f5aca79f66f2a4586
If you want the extra thick (10mm)
For customers in Germany, here#8217;s the cheapest I could find
(Amazon.de link):
'NF Entstörfilter Cinch/Cinch, vergoldet #8212; #8364; 6,90 + #8364;
2,#8211; PP' (http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B0011BE9X6)
It seems to be the same as the more expensive part sold by Hama and
others, plus it has
Audiodiffmaker
We've discussed this before... but things have moved on!
http://www.libinst.com/Audio%20DiffMaker.htm
A new version of the software (3.2) is available that is much more
intelligent/usable than before. Fascinating stuff. That's the weekend
gone.
First off: streaming WAV vs.
Many thanks, nitrous!
--
mooblie
Martin at 'HeadSpin' (http://www.headspin.plus.com)
mooblie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15378
View this thread:
Hi - nice work! Can I ask where you got the cases please? TIA!
--
mooblie
Martin at 'HeadSpin' (http://www.headspin.plus.com)
mooblie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15378
View this thread:
Sean,
Thanks for the explanation to someone (me) who doesn't know what he's
talking about when it comes to the inner workings of these devices. It
just seems bizarre to me that the bulk of this thread discussion is
about handling extremely minute variations in the timing of data
delivery for
TiredLegs;395965 Wrote:
Sean,
Thanks for the explanation to someone (me) who doesn't know what he's
talking about when it comes to the inner workings of these devices. It
just seems bizarre to me that the bulk of this thread discussion is
about handling extremely minute variations in the
agentsmith;395854 Wrote:
Do you have very loose connection to your cable as well?.
Ya I think that was the problem... I was using a glass fibre toslink
cable, which is a piece of $...@#%. The connector is round, not the
proper D shape, so it doesn't fit and align well. I threw it out, and
Michele Sanges;394894 Wrote:
What do you think about the amplifiers in T class?
Someone has tested them?
I'm reading that they are good and inexpensive equipment!!
Regards
--
Michele Sanges
...Well I have built a second system around a Tripath Kit, Looks like
this outside:
[image:
DCtoDaylight;395977 Wrote:
Ya I think that was the problem... I was using a glass fibre toslink
cable, which is a piece of $...@#%. The connector is round, not the
proper D shape, so it doesn't fit and align well. I threw it out, and
went back to a cable with the correct, nice and snug
seanadams;395753 Wrote:
Well, the RCAs have 10u caps so your corner frequency is 497Hz and you
lose 6dB per octave below that - so perhaps no bass was an
understatement. :)
The headphone outputs have 220u caps, which gets you down to 20Hz.
Sean, perhaps your calculations are based on the
andyg;395354 Wrote:
As has been repeatedly stated in this thread, you can verify that
nothing has changed in the decoding of FLAC files if you can play an
AC3 or DTS FLAC file through to your receiver. You can also record and
compare the bits output on the SPDIF interface, but that is a bit
Hi audio_fyle
Welcome to the forum!
As you see this is an audiophiles forum and its only purpose is to get
beaten by people waiting in in the bush until you say, that you hear
any difference, when you do something else, than changing
loudspeakers.
Normaly this will end with phrases like
Hi
I eventually used foobar2000 to generate stereo files. But.. I could
not hear anything from SB3. Shall I do anything special to enable
downsampling of WAV files? When I used, again, foobar2000 to downsample
to 48KHz, then of course, it was OK.
Also, beside having these 96/24 files that are
michael123;396084 Wrote:
Is Transporter different in this respect of handling high sample rate
files?
Is it more stable?
It handles 24/96 natively.
And you should be able to play 24/96 on the SB3 with SC 7.3.3 (it will
be downsampling though).
--
Mark Lanctot
Current: SB2, Transporter,
OK OK, I'll try it. :)
I'm not usually a headphone user but since Ultimate Ears is now a
Logitech product I was able to score a free pair of Triple.fi 10 pro.
:)
http://www.ultimateears.com/_ultimateears/store/products/triplefi10pro_specification.php
These are spectacularly clear and sensitive
Sean, maybe the sealed design has a different impendance at lower
frequencies? BTW I'm the opposite to you, I'd rather poke cucumbers
into my ears than those sealed thingies. :)
Although I quoted the nominal impedance of the PX-100s (same as your
'phones) this figure is an oversimplification as
Actually I find in-ear phones uncomfortable too, even though they do
sound great. Yes, the impedance varies as a function of frequency, but
perhaps the bigger issue is that the PX100 don't really seal against the
ear, so even though the driver may have sufficient bass response, it
isn't going to
can anyone help with the update of the reclocker circuit for the DUET?
--
Builder Brad
System
Linkwitz Orions++
4 x Linkwitz Thors++
1 x AKSA 25w Nivarna+
1 x AKSA 55w
2 x AKSA100
AKSA GK 1R tube pre
4 x Felicia balanced PS filters
4 x BK OMP300w rms amp modules
MDHT labs Paradisea DAC
Phil, please post the results.
(I used Liberty's LAUD suite to measure loudspeakers, rooms etc years
ago, in fact I still have an old Win98 PC in the shed just for LAUD)
--
Wirrunna
A camel is a racehorse designed by a committee.
I have been using the limited room correction capabilities of a Krell
Showcase, which although a pain to set up, have made a huge improvement
to my listening room's dreadful acoustics.
A forum member recommended I try inguz - which at first sight looks
like a great bit of software. The idea of
Results *seem* impressive, especially if you got good measuring
equipment for room correction (its still great without), -but-
- its Windows only (as far as I know)
- it requires LOTS of computing power. When experimenting with it on
a 1.8GHz/1GB RAM Win/XP machine, I could get out
Mark Lanctot;396085 Wrote:
It handles 24/96 natively.
And you should be able to play 24/96 on the SB3 with SC 7.3.3 (it will
be downsampling though).
1) I upgraded yesterday to nightly build of 7.4 (Feb 13)
Some files work OK, but I have one 96/24 that simply kills SB3.
Power on/off via
24 matches
Mail list logo
