Mr. Farrel,
The better musical experience reported by some listeners (including
professional critics) of higher resolution files in resolving systems
IMHO is well documented.
My concern, and I believe the concern of most audiophiles, is simply to
have a more enjoyable musical listening experie
JJZolx wrote:
> pfarrell;473348 Wrote:
>> Where are you finding real 24/192kHz material?
>
> One place: http://www.highdeftapetransfers.com
>
> Some folks are doing 24/192 needle drops as well.
You mean transfers from vinyl? There is nothing close to a 50kHz signal
on any vinyl record
There ar
pfarrell;473348 Wrote:
> Where are you finding real 24/192kHz material?
One place: http://www.highdeftapetransfers.com
Some folks are doing 24/192 needle drops as well.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.sli
If you're interested in learning more about the quality of high
resolution files please go to www.computeraudiophile.com. You will also
find discussions/links on the relative quality of music files at
different resolutions from 16/44.1kHz to 24/96 and higher, as well as
how to setup players to opt
cmarin wrote:
> I am familiar with the blue smoke music server that handles 24/192kHz
> and provides on the fly upsampling conversion as well; and of course you
> also have computer based severs. Too bad about the limitation on the
> transporter. I guess the economics are not sufficient to compell
I am familiar with the blue smoke music server that handles 24/192kHz
and provides on the fly upsampling conversion as well; and of course you
also have computer based severs. Too bad about the limitation on the
transporter. I guess the economics are not sufficient to compell
logitech to upgrade t
Just adding that the Touch will support up to 24/96
--
bhaagensen
bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69882
_
I have a pair of DSM-1 (6.5 inch) and i like the sound when they are
feed with spdif.
http://www.m-audio.ca/products/en_ca/StudiophileDSM1.html
the digital input support digital up to 24-bit/192kHz. So if you use
the "touch" i presume that you will be able to listen 24/96khz music.
I read tha
cmarin;473244 Wrote:
> Who is the manufacturer of the Touch? And does it provide 24/192kHz
> capability?
The Touch is the upcoming new Squeezebox, and won't support 24/192
files.
The only streamer I'm aware of that will support such high res files
are the Linn DS kit.
--
Mr_Sukebe
SB3, Merid
Who is the manufacturer of the Touch? And does it provide 24/192kHz
capability?
--
cmarin
cmarin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19133
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.p
HectorHughMunro;473034 Wrote:
> I've had a Tag AV32rBP192. It's an AV preamp but an excellent hifi DAC
> too - better than a TAG DAC20. Actually, I prefer my Beresford which is
> a TC7520 upgraded with the WM8716 chip that is in the Caiman and
> THS4032CD op amps. Probably just sub-Caiman in s
That's never going to happen. In others words, no. You may want to
consider the Touch if you are using an external dac anyway.
--
bhaagensen
bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View t
I might have missed previous posts, but does any one know if Logitech
intends to upgrade the ability of the Transporter to handle higher
resolution (e.g., 24 bit/192kHz) files? I'm currently feeding my
modwright transporter's digital signal to a playback designs DAC and
would like to have the abil
Thanks Labarum and Themis. I'll wait for Themis review.
A bit more background. My main system is what you could call (maybe) a
modest audiophile setup: transporter > Ayre AX-7e > Audio Vital Animato
(see www.audiovital.eu/animato.html). I'm quite satisfied with the
sound.
Due to changing circums
your momo;473125 Wrote:
> ...why just no ?
>
> Sounds strange beign impossible, so could we have an option in SS
> settings telling that we want TP center knob for volume by default and
> use "back" key to swap on navigation ?
>
> As fare as I know, it works so on the Boom when on mysqueezebox.
Teus de Jong;473158 Wrote:
> I would be interested in that. I would like to know if this DAC could be
> used as a DAC+headphone amp of high quality (input: receiver; headphone:
> AKG K701).
>
> Teus
I will add a review on the headphone amp part next week.
At first glance (I mean just a few hours
Teus de Jong;473158 Wrote:
> I would be interested in that. I would like to know if this DAC could be
> used as a DAC+headphone amp of high quality (input: receiver; headphone:
> AKG K701).
>
> Teus
The Caiman has a very good Class A Headphone amp. Stan Beresford claims
it drives the K701s very
Themis;462223 Wrote:
> ...
> I did not do any serious listening through my ATH-W1000 headphones, but
> I promise I will one day.
>
I would be interested in that. I would like to know if this DAC could
be used as a DAC+headphone amp of high quality (input: receiver;
headphone: AKG K701).
Teus
Thanks cliveb and teejay! A few responses:
While Crutchfield reports the Niles input impedance at 56k ohms, Niles
manual states it as 15k ohms. But based on your feedback, sounds like
either is reasonably high to be safe to connect directly to my SB
Receiver.
The level controls are two screws in
your momo;473125 Wrote:
> ...why just no ?
>
> Sounds strange beign impossible, so could we have an option in SS
> settings telling that we want TP center knob for volume by default and
> use "back" key to swap on navigation ?
>
> As fare as I know, it works so on the Boom when on mysqueezebox.
...why just no ?
Sounds strange beign impossible, so could we have an option in SS
settings telling that we want TP center knob for volume by default and
use "back" key to swap on navigation ?
As fare as I know, it works so on the Boom when on mysqueezebox.com
--
your momo
---
Deaf Cat;465186 Wrote:
> Interesting, thank you :)
>
> I don't suppose you've ever heard a Tag Mclaren AV32r?
> There is a second hand one I'm pondering upon at the moment,which I
> would only use as a pre/dac with a remote. Your new little dac sounds
> very interesting, I think if it had a rem
I think this was asked recently (and that there is a long thread about
it), the answer being no.
I used to run my Transporter directly into a Bryston 4B-SST and then
into PMC OB1s, first using the balanced cabled and latterly using normal
phonos (as the hifi wouldn't go loud enough with the basla
Hi,
Is there some configuration setting or plugin to put the Transporter
knob in permanent volume control mode? I am switching to Transporter
direct to power amp (Bryston 3B-SST) setup and this would be very
convenient.
--
Normunds
-
boikej;472890 Wrote:
> Will I damage either the SB or Niles by hooking it direct? Also, are
> there any clear (less concerned with theoretical) sound quality problems
> with this set-up?
No, but turn the level controls on the Niles down as low as possible
when you hook it up for the first time, t
boikej;472890 Wrote:
> I have a SB Receiver and just bought a Niles SI-275 amp. I would like to
> hook the SB to the Niles direct, to use fewer parts. I have level
> controls to make sure output volume is not a problem. According to
> Crutchfield specs, the amp has an input impedance of 56k ohms.
26 matches
Mail list logo
