Hi All,
i'm back from a W.E. spent with my family, not flyng Kite but Hill
Walking on the snow, hope is the same for you ... :-).
Wow, lot of people now in this Thread! I think you are moving far too
deep in techical matter for me, but is Ok, I'll keep on reading, may be
I could learn
Stratmangler;499634 Wrote:
I agree that the sample rate seems to be the key to improved audio -
most of the music DVD's that I have are AC3 on the stereo tracks, which
transcodes to 16/48 files. The audio on these discs is better than CD
with no exceptions - perhaps I've been lucky in this
marcoc1712 wrote:
What sound strange to me is that we need to debate about the
possibility that different transport sound different via the same DAC.
They do, If not, why should we have so many company selling transports
(and different models of them) on the market?
Because we are a
Throwing my 2ยข in I can tell you that I spoke with my daughter's
boyfriend, who happens to be a digital mastering engineer, and he told
me the following:
When music is prepared for issuing on a CD all the mixing and editing
is done at 24 bit and whatever sampling rate the engineer is comfortable
pfarrell;502588 Wrote:
I think jitter is an excuse for the vendors to claim that their
products
are better. i.e. pure marketing hype.
I think the big problem is that the term jitter has been miss-used so
much, that it has lost much credibility. I've seen -speaker cables-
marketed as being
DCtoDaylight wrote:
pfarrell;502588 Wrote:
I think jitter is an excuse for the vendors to claim that their
products are better. i.e. pure marketing hype.
I think the big problem is that the term jitter has been miss-used so
much, that it has lost much credibility. I've seen -speaker
ah that makes more sense. so the wires are picking up wireless
emissions *from* the transporter antennas. and in this case they were
indeed wires from the preamp, past the transporter and to the amps which
are at the bottom.
thanks for the explanation!
--
dizzysnakepilot
