Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...

2010-10-18 Thread michael123
earwaxer9;583382 Wrote: From my experience, with the Transporter at least, The DAC seems to like 24/96 files. I have experienced less noise, better staging, and more musicality to everything I have upsampled from 16/44.1. Even the 24 bit 48khz stuff sounds better upsampled to 96khz. A very

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is this noise (?) around 22KHz??

2010-10-18 Thread michael123
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/7572/aix.png This is spectrum of one of the blu-ray 96/24 stereo tracks.. -- michael123 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is this noise (?) around 22KHz??

2010-10-18 Thread michael123
difficult one :) This is out of curiosity, there are few sound engineers here on forum so I thought they might shed some light.. Is it actually faulty mastering? Which part of the process is responsible for this noise in the middle of spectrum? Why on 22KHz? DSD has noise rising on above

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] How much can transport mechanism affect SQ?

2010-10-18 Thread magiccarpetride
Gazjam;581734 Wrote: Theres many threads on the Audiophile forums which testify to the Transporter being a better transport...at least on paper - but not by anything other than a small margin, but the conscensus (to my reading) is that it is NOT worth the extra cost. Some folk on these

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is this noise (?) around 22KHz??

2010-10-18 Thread opaqueice
It's suspiciously close to the Nyquist frequency for redbook (which is 44,100/2=22,050Hz). -- opaqueice opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] How much can transport mechanism affect SQ?

2010-10-18 Thread opaqueice
magiccarpetride;583762 Wrote: Two things I've noticed that a high quality digital transport brings: 1. Lowered noise (increases the signal. reduces the noise, and that results in a very, very audible overall improvement) Which is it - increased signal or reduced noise? They're rather

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Most bang for buck? Add DAC to SB or buy Touch?

2010-10-18 Thread ncarver
SuperQ;583497 Wrote: Use a white or pink noise track. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_noise I would just figure out a good calibration volume at the source. Use the digital volume control of the squeezebox. This way it's easy to write down the calibration levels of various DACs.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Most bang for buck? Add DAC to SB or buy Touch?

2010-10-18 Thread SuperQ
ncarver;583821 Wrote: I think you are proposing using the Touch's digital volume control to equalize outputs, but I would prefer to avoid that since this is supposed to be for a test of sound quality so I really don't want the Touch modifying the source. However, this gives me an idea:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is this noise (?) around 22KHz??

2010-10-18 Thread michael123
Yes, but it is not upsampled content -- michael123 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82740

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is this noise (?) around 22KHz??

2010-10-18 Thread Phil Leigh
michael123;583842 Wrote: Yes, but it is not upsampled content How can you be sure? - looks like it is to me... -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W -