diego;603371 Wrote:
> Easy, I am not offending anybody. However, Andy wrote at one point, that
> the opinion of one of his customers (who DID actual tests...) was "FUD".
> I would not write like that about my customers, even though I am a
> fairly recognized expert in my professional domain, too.
Hi,
This is where the fun begins and the reading of reviews and
selecting ones that you can hear locally.
I cant recommend a particular brand but i can say i have heard quite a
few speakers in the last two years (HiEnd Dealer around the corner from
house) and have been impressed by the sound.
Th
cliveb;603387 Wrote:
> That's strange. My 1988 MMT CD has an album peak level of -0.05dB (this
> happens to be the peak level of the title track). I don't really see
> how it could be any higher. What exactly do you mean when you say the
> track peak is "80dB"?
Clive - I'm talking about the trac
Phil Leigh;603346 Wrote:
> I have finally retrieved the 88 version of MMT from the garage.
> 2) the track peak level of the 88 version is way too low (80dB) - the
> 09 version is 95dB
>
That's strange. My 1988 MMT CD has an album peak level of -0.05dB (this
happens to be the peak level of the t
c3p0;603263 Wrote:
> Hi,
> So my advice to improve your system, buy a cheaper low ripple Smps for
> the Vdac, (12v is way better than 19v). Keep your amp and save up for
> some new speakers. The new speakers around now are fantastic (speaker
> technology and cabinet design have improved and got c
diego;603371 Wrote:
> OK, and thanks. I did not know what a "TACT" is - I could have googled
> it up however.
>
> good to know.
>
> Thanks for that clarification. I thought, that PCM (that is the signal
> to which the flac is converted, as indicated by the server) was
> constant bitrate with a
Phil Leigh;602955 Wrote:
> Diego, I answered your question:
>
> 1) I have equipment that shows the sample rate coming out of the Touch
>
OK, and thanks. I did not know what a "TACT" is - I could have googled
it up however.
>
> 2) I have done the DTS and HDCD tests (and other tests) that prove
pippin;603198 Wrote:
> Wait. You don't want to tell me it's just the aluminum knob you don't
> have anymore?
Heh, this.
--
browellm
Modwright Transporter >> Kondo M7 >>Red Wine Signature 70.2 >>
Avantgarde Uno Nano
http://www.last.fm/user/browellm
---
I have finally retrieved the 88 version of MMT from the garage.
A quick listen confirms a couple of things:
1) this isn't a simple remaster, mix levels have been changed too
2) the track peak level of the 88 version is way too low (80dB) - the
09 version is 95dB
3) there is no limiting and only
krzys;603341 Wrote:
> Hi Phil, when you are publishing custom-convert file shouldnt you tell
> people that they cannot use it directly since it contains the MAC
> address reference of your device i.e. 00:04:20:22:01:8e in the posted
> file? and maybe also the Inguz version i.e. 0.9.30?
>
> For
Hi Phil, when you are publishing custom-convert file shouldnt you tell
people that they cannot use it directly since it contains the MAC
address reference of your device i.e. 00:04:20:22:01:8e in the posted
file? and maybe also the Inguz version i.e. 0.9.30?
For some unknown reason when I insta
Hi guys
Re the TR SE picture Mickey posted. I think it's a bit unfortunate that
the electronic part of the knob is still visible inside TR. It is my
guess that in that picture the electronic part is connected only to be
able to test TR functionality without the need of an IR remote. (But
that rea
It just tended to not work at all on my Win7 laptop, using 7.5.1,
although ocassionally it did. I wasn't worried about the user iterface,
happy to edit the settings file myself.
However Phil Leigh's Inguz plugin recently posted in another thread
seems to work reliably, and so the problem has jus
I have to say that I also never used the knob except for testing.
Always suggested it should do volume while playing like on the Boom,
that way it would have gotten more use.
But if that's the only thing missing the Transporter SE would make for
a great parts donor, after all that knob is probabl
OK, if Logitech are just using up spare inventory, that implies they
have some TP motherboards kicking around.
I don't care about the knob, the front panel buttons or the displays.
But if my TP ever dies, it would be nice to be able to slot in a
replacement mobo. So can I buy one to keep as a spa
15 matches
Mail list logo
