What evidence have you got that the speakers will be any good in your
room? None. So why commit yourself so soon? Why not wait till the room
is finished - at least that gives you the chance to return or swap the
speakers if you don't like them. And to try others. Your room isn't
particularly
I have done litte research for DAC on
Transporter - DAC-AK4396 has full capability on 24/192 decoding
htp://www.asahi-kasei.co.jp/akm/en/product/ak4396/ak4396_f00e.pdf
Also
SB Touch - DAC-AK4420 has full capability on 24/192 decoding
htp://www.akm.com/prodfolder-dac.asp?p=AK4420
I guess the
Yeah - I reckon that will sell maybe 100 more units...
You do realise they won't play 176.4 (which is MORE COMMON on
commercial releases than 192) without hardware modifications?
Globally, the major source of 192 files is illegally-distributed vinyl
rips... which is hilarious, because if one
Thanks Phil. It appears that your target points are referenced to
approx -8db, or am I seeing things?
Aside from that question, our targets compare quite well.
--
Curt962
Transporter...TouchBoom..
Curt962's
Mnyb;633874 Wrote:
I think it would work just fine,
I think so too.
Just seems a bit unnecessary for me to convert to analogue then have
the new box convert AtoD and then DtoA once again... Or to avoid all
these conversions, just don't use my pre/pro... hmmm
I shall read some more of the
What kind of projekt is this as you wanted active xover ? Do you plan to
build your own speakers :)
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2
Curt962;634075 Wrote:
Thanks Phil. It appears that your target points are referenced to
approx -8db, or am I seeing things?
Aside from that question, our targets compare quite well.
yes that's right - I'm used to drawing my targets like that when I had
my TACT...
see below for why:
OK...
So if I'm following along properly, is the -8ish db reference to avoid
applying significant boosts? It seems that this is what the negative
reference value would accomplish.
Interesting.
--
Curt962
Transporter...TouchBoom..
Curt962;634158 Wrote:
OK...
So if I'm following along properly, is the -8ish db reference to avoid
applying significant boosts? It seems that this is what the negative
reference value would accomplish.
Interesting.
yes... no boost 10dB... but also, cuts and boosts are more or less
The hardware in the transporter can do 192 but not 176 (its an issue of
crystal frequencies). The Touch can do both 176 and 192.
The Touch would be a better candidate due to the faster processor. Even
then I would only even attemp it in wired mode.
The driver code3 for the Touch is publically
Thanks...
Just for fun, I generated a new Target referenced to -6db and...I
cannot for the life of me tell why, but it sounds good!The
simulated result doesn't really look different, but...something is
working.
Very cool!
--
Curt962
Transporter...TouchBoom..
Curt962;634172 Wrote:
Thanks...
Just for fun, I generated a new Target referenced to -6db and...I
cannot for the life of me tell why, but it sounds good!The
simulated result doesn't really look different, but...something is
working.
Very cool!
maybe Bernt can shed light on this,
Phil Leigh;634174 Wrote:
maybe Bernt can shed light on this, although I bet he'll say that the
ref level makes no difference because it is all relative anyway :-)
And it probably doesn't really change anything. I would have expected
a sizeable drop in volume with a -6db reference...but that
13 matches
Mail list logo
