And a big thanks for the info. I can set pid 13 to manually but if I set
the variable PRIOWATCHDOG to 0 in the script it has no effect on the
priority(!?)
Ah - I see im using the -f flag not the -o !
Back to 'vi' and some new listening tests.
SBGK;678620 Wrote:
> 1. chrt -o -p 0 13 req
HumanMedia;678603 Wrote:
> Observations on the process priorities we are configuring in the tt
> file.
>
> For me, after editing the changes into the tt file, saving and
> rebooting:
> 1. Setting the watchdog priority to 0 in the file (PRIOWATCHDOG=0) does
> nothing and the priority remains 99 (
Questions regarding the process priorities we are configuring in the tt
file.
After editing the changes into the tt file, saving and rebooting:
1. Setting the watchdog priority to 0 in the file (PRIOWATCHDOG=0) does
nothing and the priority remains 99.
2. Same with setting PRIOIRQ42=0, IRQ remain
SBGK;678587 Wrote:
> Klaus,
>
> I have updated my TT priority settings on Page 48. have dialled back
> the settings for pdflush to 97 and irq14 and irq47 to 35. buffer set to
> 3200. probably very tailored to my system.
>
> I don't plan to update it anymore as it is pretty good and people can
Klaus,
I have updated my TT priority settings on Page 48. have dialled back
the settings for pdflush to 97 and irq14 and irq47 to 35. buffer set to
3200. probably very tailored to my system.
I don't plan to update it anymore as it is pretty good and people can
tune it to their system.
looking
SBGK;678549 Wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have found the latest settings to be detrimental to the balance of
> vocals so am trying irq 14 and irq 47 at priority 34, this gives more
> emphasis to vocals and high frequencies and sounds closer to how the
> music sounds on other sources. shall change p48 setti
Thanks SBGK for share your findings and with the lastest setting I realy
like the sound... from page 48 its says prio 37 for irq 14 & 47
--
RotelMan
RotelMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=39498
hi,
i have found the latest settings to be detrimental to the balance of
vocals so am trying irq 14 and irq 47 at priority 34, this gives more
emphasis to vocals and high frequencies and sounds closer to how the
music sounds on other sources. shall change p48 settings to reflect
these.
don't kno
terjehaa;678418 Wrote:
> Hi Rolf
>
> I think post #474 on page 48 contains SBGK's final settings if I
> understood him correctly ;)
Couldn't wait, had to try this! ;)
Love it!!
Thank you SBGK!!
Regards
Rolf
--
NoRoDa
SBGK;678302 Wrote:
> try the updated ones in the post above, works for me.
Nicevery, very nice. I could swear the soundstage's been widened
about by a foot or so on each side, too.
I keep being surprised at how much more depth, detail and breadth those
speakers will put out if the upstre
soundcheck;678413 Wrote:
> No.
>
> Though I've implemented a profle switcher into my own current TT
> version.
> I put SBGK's profile in as one out of currently 5 profiles that I use
> for testing.
>
> I'm now in the position to switch very easily between all of them.
>
> As you might have
Ok, has also changed some parameters as well as some of SBGK´s, but Im
still looking for a solution for a more fuller, organic sound with
deeper but good controlled bass- but want keeping those treble sparkle
of the original TT3.0 which is tonal more similar by switching the
toolbox off
Any idea
HumanMedia;678417 Wrote:
> One of the additional steps in Dynaudiorules tweak is that the samba
> startup code in the was commented out, stopping samba from starting.
> Just checking thats been incorporated as well?
> (Im guessing that it may be might of those processes thats been
> nulled?)
Sa
NoRoDa;678403 Wrote:
> Looks like these last prio-settings are working good for many of you.
> Is soundcheck also using the same settings?
>
> I want to try these settings myself, but I'm not sure on wich parts of
> the tt-file to change/replace.
>
> I'm currently running tt 3.0 with the defaul
One of the additional steps in Dynaudiorules tweak is that the samba
startup code in the was commented out, stopping samba from starting.
Just checking thats been incorporated as well?
(Im guessing that it may be might of those processes thats been
nulled?)
--
HumanMedia
--
NoRoDa;678403 Wrote:
>
> Is soundcheck also using the same settings?
>
No.
Though I've implemented a profle switcher into my own current TT
version.
I put SBGK's profile in as one out of currently 5 profiles that I use
for testing.
I'm now in the position to switch very easily between all
SBGK;678302 Wrote:
> try the updated ones in the post above, works for me.
Tried your last posted set of values in the tt file.
In my system, too much lower treble energy and not in a good way.
Started slowly stepping back towards the tt3 defaults and I have
something better suited to my system
Looks like these last prio-settings are working good for many of you.
Is soundcheck also using the same settings?
I want to try these settings myself, but I'm not sure on wich parts of
the tt-file to change/replace.
I'm currently running tt 3.0 with the default values, but the PRIOIRQ47
value se
rgro;678299 Wrote:
> O.Kso I got too curious and gave SBGK's tweaks a shot last night and
> listened for several hours. My initial impression was that the music
> was very smth but, in fact, had an overall muffled quality to
> it.
>
I'd pretty much agree with you on this one. Thoug
19 matches
Mail list logo
