Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Upsampling Impressions

2013-07-11 Thread edwardian
Julf wrote: > Problem is that that might or might not work if you ever switch to some > other software. Understood. Thanks for the information. I've been organizing my music collection over the past few months and my intention was to have a copy as WAV and a copy as FLAC to take advantage of che

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Upsampling Impressions

2013-07-11 Thread Julf
edwardian wrote: > For me, there's no hassle tagging WAV files. I use dBpoweramp to tag the > WAV files and LMS/Squeezebox Touch has no problem reading them. Problem is that that might or might not work if you ever switch to some other software. "To try to judge the real from the false will a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Upsampling Impressions

2013-07-11 Thread pippin
I can confirm that WAV actually causes a LOT more load than FLAC decoding, at least on an iPhone. Of course, an iPhone will always uses WiFi but then I believe there have been similar measurements on the SB Touch as well. Especially is we talk about upsampled material, we are talking about a LOT

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Upsampling Impressions

2013-07-11 Thread edwardian
Julf wrote: > Any specific reasons to prefer WAV? I think the general view is that > with lower-end processors (such as those in the squeezeboxes) that don't > have dedicated I/O processors the additional network load caused by the > wasted bits in WAV files causes more CPU load (and thus theoret

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Upsampling Impressions

2013-07-11 Thread soundcheck
edwardian wrote: > Klaus, I read your document, and unless I missed something, you were > resampling from 16/44.1 to 24/96? Is that correct? Did you ever try > going from 16/44.1 to 24/88.2 or 24/176.4? If so, did you hear any > difference (compared to 24/96)? > > And I also tried SOX upsampling

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Upsampling Impressions

2013-07-11 Thread Julf
edwardian wrote: > I didn't like the idea that it only output FLAC (as all my music is WAV) Any specific reasons to prefer WAV? I think the general view is that with lower-end processors (such as those in the squeezeboxes) that don't have dedicated I/O processors the additional network load caus

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Squeezebox Touch/Classic vs cheap USB DAC ?

2013-07-11 Thread Julf
cadfish wrote: > Yesterday I learned in a dramatical fashion, that the amps and speakers > are so much more important in order to have good sound than the DAC Absolutely. It is funny how a lot of audiophiles fuss over their DACs and cables, when shifting their speakers a few inches or even putti