ralphpnj wrote:
http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/2013-tas-editors-choice-awards-digital-interconnects/?utm_campaign=Newsletterutm_medium=emailutm_source=email-147
Bring your shovel and get ready for a good laugh.
The one to try today is this
michael123 wrote:
Phil
I can leave with this dead-end for next 10 years,
again, the level of the mod is so high, that the player now competes
with the
sound of Metronome and EMM Labs
Few bugs in firmware and optimization of the code is not something not
possible.
If
You have to love this comment appearing after the article of the P.W.B.
Cream Electret.
Chemical 'C'
Submitted by sudont on December 8, 2012 - 9:56am.
I have no difficulty believing that chemical compounds can enhance the
listening experience. My own tweak - let's call it chemical c -
greatly
Jeff52 wrote:
You have to love this comment (below) appearing after the Stereophile
article about P.W.B. Cream Electret. The inventor of the Cream
discussed Chemical A and Chemical B as examples of certain chemicals
having a negative and positive effect on listeners.
OP here. My insurance company is still frittering around with my
damaged Transporter, i.e. I still don't have it back from the repair
company. Arggh.
That's step #1 in order to figure out what I'm going to do.
IF there was a feasible way to rip SACDs, I'd be all over either the
DAC2 or the
Jeff52 wrote:
You have to love this comment (below) appearing after the Stereophile
article about P.W.B. Cream Electret. The inventor of the Cream
discussed Chemical A and Chemical B as examples of certain chemicals
having a negative and positive effect on listeners.
michael123 wrote:
It really shines with good quality albums, and more with the
high-resolution.. especially 176/192Khz (e.g. Dave Brubeck/TimeOut).
Left me breathless
Yeah, on Brubecks Time Out you are lucky when you reach 15bit in 1 or 2
drumhits searching thru the whole album. When it
I say that the 176.4/24 version sounds much more realistic and live (on
metronome c6) than the downsampled (on Transporter)..
Michael
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View this
In short you like the metronomes tube signature and you feel your system
is more alive. Everyone his own, so have fun!
Transporter (modded) - RG142 - Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks - Sommer SPK240 - self-made speakers
I shall like it, otherwise I have a (big) problem :)
Not every 176/192Khz recording sounds like that,
but I had some others like the SACD rip of Natalie Cole/Ask A Woman Who
Knows..
With this disc it was interesting.. few years ago I had Denon A11
DVD/SACD player. And this SACD sounded
michael123 wrote:
I shall like it, otherwise I have a (big) problem :)
Not every 176/192Khz recording sounds like that,
but I had some others like the SACD rip of Natalie Cole/Ask A Woman Who
Knows..
With this disc it was interesting.. few years ago I had Denon A11
DVD/SACD player. And
why broken? :)
I had many blind and non-blind listening tests with my friends..
OK,
anyway just wanted to close this loop ..
SlimDevices is history..
Squeeze line of devices is history..
Yet, I continue to use Squeezeserver with (broken) Squeezelite, which
feeds via KS and proprietary
michael123 wrote:
OK,
anyway just wanted to close this loop ..
SlimDevices is history..
Squeeze line of devices is history..
Unfortunately yes but maybe John Swensson and friends will come up with
something greatly usable. Also with affordable TB SSDs around the corner
there come new
ralphpnj wrote:
You guys have it backwards - one has to be either smoking, drinking or
just plain on something in order to believe all their BS. In other
words, the last thing any audiophile who believes in this nonsense needs
is more drugs!
Speaking of which, be sure to check out the TAS
14 matches
Mail list logo
