Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread Mnyb
Nothing really new . Meridian realised in the early 90's that the way forward was digital active DSP controlled speakers ( other realised that active speakers was needed in the 60-70's ormpossiblynearlier for pa ) . The Meridian speakers are not perfect I'm not saying that what I have is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread pippin
jimbobvfr400 wrote: Yes it's 1 paragraph in a very interesting 5 page article. Worth a read IMO Yep. And especially... With a good active speaker design it's not just cables. If you do this right you don't need (and don't WANT) DACs, preamps, power amps, DSPs and all that other stuff that

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread bernt
pippin wrote: Yep. And especially... With a good active speaker design it's not just cables. If you do this right you don't need (and don't WANT) DACs, preamps, power amps, DSPs and all that other stuff that makes a hifi system today. Just speakers with a network connection and a display

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread Mnyb
Pippin was it not you that used Adam active speakers ? I have one of the small models as computer speakers Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread pippin
Mnyb wrote: Pippin was it not you that used Adam active speakers ? Yes, I do. Although there's certainly much more potential for good sound quality than what they offer but for the size they have it's a good start. --- learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread pippin
bernt wrote: http://www.teenageengineering.com/products/od-11/ Right concept but in the speaker design they do pretty much everything that article condemns. Bass-reflex, putting speakers WITHIN a housing and so on... It's the same kind of integrated approach but I wouldn't expect superior

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread bernt
pippin wrote: Right concept but in the speaker design they do pretty much everything that article condemns. Bass-reflex, putting speakers WITHIN a housing, beamforming and so on... It's the same kind of integrated approach but I wouldn't expect superior sound from it. It's a Stig Carlsson

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread pippin
Yea, but if you read the article it's EXACTLY the kind of speaker design that completely ignores phase and impulse response. --- learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox and Logitech UE Smart Radio as well as iPeng Party, the free Party-App, at

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better SQ w/o iTunes integration

2014-07-04 Thread netchord
an accidental discovery-perhaps others have already commented on this, but it was new, and a surprise, to me. background; my primary system consists of a Transporter--MF A5 integrated. Transporter is connected via ethernet, as is a 4-5 y/o mac mini. music is stored on an external FW800 drive,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better SQ w/o iTunes integration

2014-07-04 Thread darrenyeats
Could be just power supply improvement. I do believe this can make a difference. Given your hi-fi is in effect modulating the power supply, it isn't beyond the bounds of reason anyway (even if designers try to design out susceptibility to common problems). Check it, add to it!

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better SQ w/o iTunes integration

2014-07-04 Thread lrossouw
If you are sending the same bits to the touch it should not make a difference where it is coming from. With or without itunes integration. Either 1. you are not really hearing this. I suggest a double blind test to be sure. Or 2. there must be something else that has changed. Maybe volume

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better SQ w/o iTunes integration

2014-07-04 Thread darrenyeats
Sorry I actually misread the comment about the analog rig - thought that it had improved also. If not, then replay gain etc is a good candidate. Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] INTERNET TEST: 24-bit vs. 16-bit Audio - Results Posted

2014-07-04 Thread Archimago
Part III with people's subjective descriptions and testimony about how easy or hard this test was is now up... Also some final thoughts and a link to the Pono advert for come contrast and comparison. http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2014/07/24-bit-vs-16-bit-audio-test-part-iii.html Archimago's

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Better SQ w/o iTunes integration

2014-07-04 Thread netchord
darrenyeats wrote: Sorry I actually misread the comment about the analog rig - thought that it had improved also. If not, then replay gain etc is a good candidate. i don't use replay gain. i'm really hearing it; just don't have an explanation for it. to be sure, i don't really need an

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Another interesting read - this time about speaker development.

2014-07-04 Thread ralphpnj
Two more choice quotes from the article: The rarity of such devices suggests that the reasons are not technical and that the application of logic is absent: almost the definition of audiophile behaviour. When the sound from a tablet has rapidly become so good considering the serious constraints