Julf wrote:
> Good point. It also leads me to ask if the subjectivist view of "if I
> hear it, it must be The Truth" is either the ultimate in solipsism, or
> just extremely arrogant.
you misstate what I, and likely most other subjectivists believe: "If I
hear it, I hear it." i can then
As I asked in the thread title: Is the amount of jitter a function of
the type of connection?
What I mean is does the amount of jitter vary for different types of
connection?
So is there more or less jitter present in a USB connection than in a
coax connection?
More or less jitter present in a
Mnyb wrote:
> He he is it not another trend by the golden eared to not have sufficient
> buffers and try make the PC behave as much as possible as a bad old CD
> player and stream continiusly with very small buffers ?
Interesting observation Mnyb. I really wonder who started this idea
about
.moving right along! In any case, I love my lossless collection
which has close to 1000 hires albums (yes, a fortune). And played
through standard STP and UTP cabling here to my streamer and DAC. But
mainly - I enjoy my music. End.
Marantz NA-11S1 PCM/DSD streamer with Squeezebox Touch
What I mean is does the amount of jitter vary for different types of
connection?
\"YES\"
So is there more or less jitter present in a USB connection than in a
coax connection?
\"IT DEPENDS ON THE TYPE OF USB AND CAN BE IMPLEMENTATION DEPENDENT YOU
CAN NOT SAY UNLESS YOU HAVE TWO MEASURED
netchord wrote:
> do you enjoy the music more, constantly checking your audio privilege?
I suspect those who live in the wonderful make-believe world of unicorns
and fairies enjoy their music more than I do, but then again, there is
more to life than just audio...
"To try to judge the real
marcoc1712 wrote:
> Sure, doing what you are doing here, as an example.
Good point. It also leads me to ask if the subjectivists view of "if I
hear it, it must be The Truth" is either the ultimate in solipsism, or
just extremely arrogant.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always
Julf wrote:
> I suspect those who live in the wonderful make-believe world of unicorns
> and fairies enjoy their music more than I do, but then again, there is
> more to life than just audio...
Dunno, I would say that a near pathological focus on finding the
imaginary flaws that need imaginary
Julf wrote:
> I suspect those who live in the wonderful make-believe world of unicorns
> and fairies enjoy their music more than I do, but then again, there is
> more to life than just audio...
but not more than music.
--
4 TB Drobo-->FW 800-->mac mini-->Ethernet
Transporter--> Wireworld
Julf wrote:
> I suspect those who live in the wonderful make-believe world of unicorns
> and fairies enjoy their music more than I do, but then again, there is
> more to life than just audio...
Sure, doing what you are doing here, as an example.
Julf wrote:
> Good point. It also leads me to ask if the subjectivist view of "if I
> hear it, it must be The Truth" is either the ultimate in solipsism, or
> just extremely arrogant.
Don't know, not interested about, never said this and sure is not my
mind.
Sure if I heard it it's real for me
marcoc1712 wrote:
> Sure if I heard it it's real for me using my system
I guess that then comes down to your definition of "real". It still
assumes your senses are infallible.
You are the only one using absolute terms here, pretending to know "The
Thruth".
That is actually pretty much
12 matches
Mail list logo
