Mnyb wrote:
> It's a 24 bit volume control dithering may be academic in those cases
> may actually not be needed in practice .
> I don't think for example a SB3 or transporter has the horsepower to run
> a dither algorithm ,so yes I think I actually read years ago that it is
> undithered .
>
>
Here's Sean's original post in this very forum (from my bookmarks). :)
'_Sean_Adams'_Response-O-Matic_'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?35150-SB3-interference-due-to-titanium-dental-implant=200910#post200910)
darrenyeats wrote:
> Mynb,
> Your comment stung me, I really thought otherwise and it's bothered me
> since.
>
> I think* I've managed to attenuate with dither, albeit in a fixed
> fashion, by doing this in convert.conf and setting the regular volume to
> 100.
>
> In convert.conf, set the "flc
andy_c wrote:
> Here's Sean's original post in this very forum (from my bookmarks). :)
> '_Sean_Adams'_Response-O-Matic_'
> (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?35150-SB3-interference-due-to-titanium-dental-implant=200910#post200910)
Cheers for that :)
Mnyb wrote:
> Ok but why ? Was it you that always had a constant upsamling going on or
> was it some other member . Or is t to defeat potential intersample overs
> ? I have for the last months tried to find out if I can produce any
> awerse of positive effect by not running the volume on the
