darrenyeats wrote:
> I can't think of a more apt place than the Logitech Audiophiles forum to
> place such an ad, and unless you can, then how about move the discussion
> to another thread.
I agree it is a very apt place for such an ad, but if I placed an ad
here for some gear I was selling, I
JJZolx wrote:
> Thread crapping at its finest.
"Thread crapping" seems to be a favourite term among a certain crowd
that don't like their faith to be questioned - a mild form of "if you
run out of reasonable arguments, at least try to discredit your opponent
somehow".
"To try to judge the
JJZolx wrote:
> Thread crapping at its finest.
Matched the quality of the alleged mods, which basically amount to be
crapping on the gear.
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this
Forgive me if this is covered ground, though I did search this thread
(and many others) with every keyword I thought might give me the answer,
with no luck.
I'm running LMS 7.7.5 (the last "official" release?) on Windows 7 with
two Duet Squeezebox players. I don't need RC, just the EQ, and I
As this is a sales tread .
Is the original components retained so that the player can be restored
to it's original configuration . that would actually increase
prospective customers ?
Tubes is not automatically considered "best" even among card carrying
audiophiles .
Many would actually
JJZolx wrote:
> This wasn't an audio discussion, you moron -- it was a "For Sale".
>
> "Thread crapping" is one of the kinder things I could call it.
So come up with some reasonable arguments instead of all the name
calling?
StephenPG wrote:
> So come up with some reasonable arguments instead of all the name
> calling?
What the fuck is wrong you you people??
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this
JJZolx wrote:
> This wasn't an audio discussion, you moron -- it was a "For Sale".
Stage 2 of "Audiophile debating 101": "If opponent makes you look
stupid, resort to ad hominem and call him/her names".
Looking forward to Stage 3, "call to ban trolls".
"To try to judge the real from the
Note that no discussion has taken place, despite the trolling from the
usual idiots.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread:
JJZolx wrote:
> Note that no discussion has taken place, despite the trolling from the
> usual idiots.
We do have to thank you for your meaningful contributions and insights.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the
JJZolx wrote:
> What the fuck is wrong you you people??
Ah, insults and profanity. Interesting side step.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W
JJZolx wrote:
> What the fuck is wrong you you people??
Hope this helps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument
StephenPG's Profile:
Julf wrote:
> "Thread crapping" seems to be a favourite term among a certain crowd
> that don't like their faith to be questioned - a mild form of "if you
> run out of reasonable arguments, at least try to discredit your opponent
> somehow".
This wasn't an audio discussion, you moron -- it was
13 matches
Mail list logo
