ashmore wrote:
So I love the SB3. It's hooked up to a Rotel RA 05 + Quad 11L + a KEF
sub.
Hi, I'm using a SB3, Rotel RA01 + Focal bookshelf speakers, and Rythmik sub.
Not too dissimilar.
But I notice from listening comparisons of CDs through a modest CD
player that the SB3 has less range
Then, while you are at it, run the flac test on the flacs in your backup!
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
You should be able to connect any sub with a high level (speaker level)
input to your amp. Effectively the output of your main amp is the input to
the amp in the sub.
Ive been using a http://www.bkelec.com/HiFi/Sub_Woofers/XLS200.htm in a
similar set up for 9 months now and am very pleased. On
Gibbo wrote:
but i'm thinking cheap options, £100.
is it possible?
At that price, hmm, you could pay someone to slam your front door in time to
the music.
Or, to stretch the budget a little:
http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=645977
I hope that helps
tonyptony wrote:
I agree with
mortod that you could probably do better by trying to correct that dip
with moving the speakers around or maybe trying some room treatment.
Or maybe moving the microphone/listening position.
___
audiophiles mailing
tonyptony wrote:
All of the stock target curves did leave the bass feeling a little weak,
happily solved by adding a 0dB to 8dB ramp between 80Hz and 30Hz.
Toby, how did you do this?
Your .drc file contains a line PSPointsFile=somefile.txt. That file contains
a definition of the target
tingtong5 wrote:
245KD6H (labeled X2 24.576MHz)
The ratio might be correct, but the absolute frequencies are weird
aren't they?
24.576MHz = 512 * 48kHz
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
opaqueice wrote:
One interesting point the article makes is that since many MP3 players
implement some version of replaygain, the whole rationale for
over-compression starts to go away.
It also mentions CD changers as a reason for this trend starting. That makes
more sense than previous
tingtong5 wrote:
When using this calibration file with drc the sound becomes way too
bright. So I reversed all the values (plus - minus and vice versa) but
then the sound became too dull (lack of high frequencies).
Ive just started trying drc too (family is out of the house all weekend -
tingtong5 wrote:
The amount of deviation from the ecm8000 response claimed by Behringer
is so high that if this is really true this means this mic is totally
useless without calibration.
The graph posted above is not too dissimilar to another ecm8000 calibration
posted here:
Mark Lanctot wrote:
Besides, it would be better to get them to stop doing this stupid stuff
in the first place. If they won't stop that, why would they ever put RG
correction data on the CD?
And it is even less likely that they would put a *correct* RG value in
there. it would just be
seanadams wrote:
This is about the same as complaining that you can't scratch on a CD
player the same way you could on last century's phonograph...
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your great summary of how ff/rw work differently between CD and
tape deck. It is clear that the designers of both of those
tricka wrote:
Balanced XLR out's are
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_audio
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
Jaco wrote:
You can also give Magnatune a try. See http://www.magnatune.com/
I recently noticed flacs are available on http://www.bleep.com/ too.
But Magnatune are great - visit them first :-)
___
audiophiles mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
