jcboy2128 wrote:
> Can any experts tell me will it be big improvement if I connect M2Tech
> EVO Clock to my Transporter (plug in World Clock In). However, because
> M2Tech can't make output as Master Clock, any suggestion for Master
> Clock which is good match with Transporter?
I'm no expert, bu
The Lavry DA10 and DA11 are well worth considering. A step up in SQ from
the similarily priced Benchmarks in my experience.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
View
system, I was satisfied, and I stopped looking.
>
Why do you use a preamp at all? I too am using am SB3 + Lavry DA10 and
all the preamps I've tried give me a poorer result than having the DA10
feed the power amp directly. I use the DA10's volume control so that the
SB3's volum
r channel in their DAC.
http://www.aplhifi.com/DAC1-product-page.htm
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices
would love to see pictures
and a schematic of it.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
View this thread: http://forums.slimdev
uble the power of the
Rotel. (On a pair of easy-to-drive Infinity speakers the amps sounded
much more similar).
In addition to the Cambridge, I suggest you give the Rotel RA-04 a
listen. Other obvious candidates in your price range are the NAD
C325BEE and th
ted for the digital mods only, I assume you use an external
DAC. Would you mind telling us which one?
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
View this thread: http://f
=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN%2F5872531
I wonder if these documents contain sufficient information for someone
who wanted to
Patrick Dixon;131088 Wrote:
> I have, and it sounded considerably better in every case (including with
> a Benchmark DAC1).
Thanks, that is interesting.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slim
Btw, as the theme of this thread is redwine audio's SB upgrades
specifically, I should add that RWA does *not* make use of any bybee
filters, afaik.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://for
se for that
matter) extremely dubious.
As always, YMMV.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26337
then, the improvements would be
small.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthr
that upgrading the internals of my SB3 is not worth
the money and effort. Should I find the SB lacking in sound quality as
I upgrade the rest of my gear, I'll go the external DAC or Transporter
route.
;-)
(Baybee filters? Puh-lee
dazzler,
You are correct regarding the connections.
As to which DAC sounds best, you'll just have to listen and judge for
yourselves.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?u
no complaints about the sound quality of
my stock SB3. To my ears, and in my setup, it outperforms my
Redbook-only Pioneer CD-player which cost more than 2x of what the SB3
does.
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://f
hought of it that way.
One could argue, though, that at 10 cents, ANY improvement would be
cost-effective.
Actual measurements of K vs KE would have been interesting, but I
suppose that is too much to ask of the modders. ;-)
--
blackbear
--
only 10 cents. So, if the "KE"
makes sense, why doesn't Slim Devices use that in the first place?
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
Vie
which property of the digital output interface and signal are
these mods supposed to improve?
--
blackbear
blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015
View this thread: http://forums.sli
18 matches
Mail list logo
