Thank you for not making fun of my foreign vocabulary. This is a
worldwide community.
I was trying for the word "potent".
SuperQ;373814 Wrote:
> IMHO, you just invalidated your post right there. ;-)
--
jimi00
SB3 > DIYEDEN SVDAC05 > Trends TA10.1 > Elac BS243
Slim
rogress".
> George
>
> PS how in the world do you spell y'al, you'all...?
--
jimi00
SB3 > DIYEDEN SVDAC05 > Trends TA10.1 > Elac BS243
Slimp3 > Trends TA10.1 > Q-Acoutics 1020
---
d, I might as well repeat myself... would it be
shamefull for anyone to run an A/B test and tell us what they think?
--
jimi00
----
jimi00's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16
n my SB3 (appart from the fact
that my unit could be faulty)?
I know this is the audiophile forum but couldnt we be a bit more
logical? Why doesnt anyone else just listen to the two and give us his
opinion?
(BTW I dont have an S
zed that SB3 might sound worse than Slimp3, after all SBR
> sounds a bit under SB3 too. It IS intriguing, though, that the SliMP3
> sounds better than the SB3 fed with lossless.
> That's very strange, indeed. How would this be possible ?
>
> (but I wouldn't dare t
ick out the sound of a plucked
guitar string or a crash cymbal in a recording.
"Welcome to dreamland" is not proper syllogism either.
--
jimi00
----
jimi00's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.ph
n DAC on the SB3?
In a nutshell, does technology have ears?
--
jimi00
jimi00's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16771
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.
