I wouldn't say a subjectivist point of view is necessarily
unscientific.
I understand that some of the posters in this thread are engineering
guys. It kind of makes sense that you take a more objectivist position.
In the natural sciences, you sometimes can have relatively tightly
controlled
>From 'HA'
(http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=105754):
>
> FLAC decoding is something like 50 CPU cycles/sample. I doubt you can
> load a WAV file from disk that quickly due to the high bitrate.
>
>
> FLACs can play on a 486 at 66 MHz
>
The point is, the default compression
probedb wrote:
Track Title: The Distant Mechanised Glow of Eastern European Dance
Parties
I can beat that with the following track titles:
When The Going Gets Tough, The Tough Get Karazee (Serious Bonus Beats
Mix)
or
Wortkabular (Tobi Neumann S
garym wrote:
Unfortunately, these turn in to mud slinging contests (and be prepared
to be told that if you say you need more than 65,000 tracks you're
either lying or crazy).
Or a file sharer who doesn't pay for his music ;)
utgg wrote:
I did say well organised. And I still maintain 100 is reasonable as an
average - for all those long titles there will plenty of short ones as
well.
100 bytes is ridiculously small. For search, you need to store artist,
album artist, composer, track name, album name, genre, release
Whatever DAC is in my ~$200 Pio receiver, '13 model. I think it's pretty
good :)
poing's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=63617
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72018
I think some hypotheses are too ridiculous to be taken seriously. That
is all.
poing's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=63617
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103146
