I have just checked this and I am able to play both 24/192 and 24/176
but the files are transcoded to 96 and 88 respectively. The latter are
the frequencies shown as input by my Tact Audio TCS3.
When I click on the particular track for info it seems that the 192
track is being converted to FLAC
jra...@wbs.co.za;634000 Wrote:
I have just checked this and I am able to play both 24/192 and 24/176
but the files are transcoded to 96 and 88 respectively. The latter are
the frequencies shown as input by my Tact Audio TCS3.
When I click on the particular track for info it seems that the
jra...@wbs.co.za;634000 Wrote:
When I click on the particular track for info it seems that the 192
track is being converted to FLAC but at a much lower bit rate, about
786 which is what I would get with 16/44 files.
My library is all in Apple lossless format.
Regards
Jose
It seems
Mnyb;634004 Wrote:
It seems that way, but it is actually that track info thats is wrong, it
is properly transcoded to 24/96 or 88.2 .
It's one audiophile every week that gets Cardiac dysrhythmia over this
(this observation pops up every week for the last 5 years, no one uses
the forum
CharlieG;634026 Wrote:
I haven't seen that particular note for a while now (I'm using 7.5.4).
For example, I am looking at the info on a 24/96 track, Hey Nineteen.
It simply states, bitrate: 2969kbps VBR. There is no longer any note
about converted to xxx. I'm viewing this on my Touch.
Well it still a very classy and classic product :) if I had use for high
quality analogue outs or it's clock in features I would sure get one.
Well engineered and a solid design.
Dead or not digital audio have not changed much since 2006 either it's
age shows when it comes to apps and services
Phil Leigh;633268 Wrote:
erm... the crystal oscillator(s) always runs at a fixed very high
frequency... the clock circuit that controls the dac runs at the
required sample rate...
as far as I know, that's not the case with AKM,
the only limitation is the (weak) CPU and the (heavy) firmware
michael123;633346 Wrote:
as far as I know, that's not the case with AKM,
the only limitation is the (weak) CPU and the (heavy) firmware
Discussion is pointless since the Transporter line is dead, I am happy
enough it is still supported by the Squeeze ecosystem.
P.S. There are quite a
michael123;633346 Wrote:
as far as I know, that's not the case with AKM,
the only limitation is the (weak) CPU and the (heavy) firmware
Discussion is pointless since the Transporter line is dead, I am happy
enough it is still supported by the Squeeze ecosystem.
P.S. There are quite a
The SE is simply a normal Transporter without the expensive knob on the
front.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
andynormancx's Profile:
I understand that. It is still available so I would therefore not think
that the transporter line is dead.
--
dminches
Modwright Platinum Signature Truth modified Transporter Modwright
LS-100 Modwright KWA-150 Vandersteen 5A
The clock fed into the DAC chip has to be a certain multiple of the
sample rate, usually 128 or 256. Frequently it can be greater as well
such as 512.
Common frequencies for the 48Khz family are 12.288Mhz or 24.576MHz.
IF the minimum multiplier for the DAC chip is 128, and 12.288 was
chosen as
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=219727postcount=3
Transporter:
11.2896 and 24.5760
--
michael123
Michael
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View this thread:
dminches;633376 Wrote:
I understand that. It is still available so I would therefore not think
that the transporter line is dead.
Defo - thats a truism :)
As for the future, the technology-platform on which the TP is built is
dying and along with it, the TP - to stay in the termoninolgy.
michael123;633390 Wrote:
Expensive or not... it is surgically reduced plain Transporter circa
2006
Its not only the TP itself thats reduced - AFAIK its only available
(from Logitech) in the US. So its hardly still going strong...
--
bhaagensen
michael123;633409 Wrote:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=219727postcount=3
Hmm, thats interesting, that means that theoretically it can do 192 but
NOT 176.
John S.
--
JohnSwenson
JohnSwenson's Profile:
Assuming it is a limitation of Transporter's processing power, can we
relax the fw a bit to support 24/192 WAV or AIFF? Or FLAC with lesser
compression level?
PS - title should read Any way
--
Kuro
Kuro's Profile:
Its not possible.
--
bhaagensen
bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=87939
This is a hardware issue, not a firmware issue... and no, it can't be
done.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103
- full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x
hardware?
--
michael123
Michael
michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=87939
michael123;633255 Wrote:
hardware?
yes - the TP clocks and supporting circuitry cannot run at 192
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103
- full
As far as I know, clocks are OK and the circuitry is fine (we modded
Transporter twice, replaced output stage, replaced two clocks, modded
transformers, added power supplies for clocks, some more capacitors for
the power supply).
DAC is fine as well
CPU is weak and cannot carry the bitstream of
michael123;633264 Wrote:
As far as I know, clocks are OK and the circuitry is fine (we modded
Transporter twice, replaced output stage, replaced two clocks, modded
transformers, added power supplies for clocks, some more capacitors for
the power supply).
There are two clocks, which are
The clock is not @ 48KHz, at some other freq, I do not remember..
Of course it can run on 192Khz, it always runs on a constant
frequency, regardless of signal
And yes, we've been here before :)
I feel good enough with 96Khz.
Modern DACs now have support for 384/32, so even supporting 192KHz
michael123;633267 Wrote:
The clock is not @ 48KHz, at some other freq, I do not remember..
Of course it can run on 192Khz, it always runs on a constant
frequency, regardless of signal
And yes, we've been here before :)
I feel good enough with 96Khz.
Modern DACs now have support for
The forum search function is recommended this old issue has been
rehashed many times in different forms (same goes for Touch) for the at
least 5 years.
This is also a non problem as there is almost no real music available
in 192k
And some is sourced from consumer SACD ? who's ultrasonic
26 matches
Mail list logo
