Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz on a Transporter

2009-07-06 Thread murrayporteous
Thanks for the hint. Yes it seems ok according to the log. My set up is not so bad and changes are maybe not that dramatic. With Foobar I can switch the correction on and off and the results are immediately obvious. With Inguz you have to restart the track so it is up to my aural memory and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz on a Transporter

2009-07-06 Thread krzys
Sounds strange. In my setup the differences in SQ are equally obvious in foobar and in Inguz. I use Audiolense too; did you try the more correction filter? When listening pay attention to the positioning of the instruments and stage width. Describe your room and speakers please. Chris --

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz on a Transporter

2009-07-03 Thread murrayporteous
Hi all, I've recently invested in a Transporter as a source for my DAC. I have a dCS Paganini 3 box set up with word clock, so the transporter matches in well in that I can use the word clock and an AES input to the Paganini DAC. Mainly I bought the Transporter as a way to move toward a hard

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz on a Transporter

2009-07-03 Thread krzys
First of all are you sure you followed the Inguz audio installation instructions and the Inguz plug-in is really on line? As you know the result of the DRC is generally quite obvious. Take a look at the Inguz log file this is your best friend: http://inguzaudio.com/usage/logfile/ chris --