Mnyb wrote:
> Can you drive your Vandersteens with the marantz ? , I've used a mixed
> topology in the past driving some channels with the ht amp and some with
> more powerfull amps .
> My old Dynaudio speakers where basically low impedance 4 ohm and very
> inefficient they worked much better wit
ralphpnj wrote:
> Not all HT receivers have inferior power amp sections. Marantz HTRs all
> seem to have very decent power amp sections as do the top models from
> most manufacturers. It's the el cheapo receivers that have not so good
> power amp sections.
Can you drive your Vandersteens with th
Mnyb wrote:
> Good to see , it's basically a toss up depending in implementation as
> usual , there is no way to favor any digital interface over the other
> all basically "works".
>
> And AV recievers have got awesome performance lately ? If it has preout
> you can probably surprise an unsuspec
Archimago wrote:
> Hello mnyb.
> Glad to see you guys enjoying Keaton's "kontribution". The man's old but
> crafty :cool:.
>
> Yes, I did test the Onkyo relatively fully back in this post:
> http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2013/10/measurements-onkyo-tx-nr1009-as-hdmi.html
>
> The HDMI jitter actua
Mnyb wrote:
> Thanks again for the measurement part .
>
> Hdmi has been accused of horrible " jitter " in it's implementation ?
> And there are probably some not so fantastic implementations out there
> especially older ht amps .
> Can you see any of that in this Onkyo amp ?
>
> What's the spec
Thanks again for the measurement part .
Hdmi has been accused of horrible " jitter " in it's implementation ?
And there are probably some not so fantastic implementations out there
especially older ht amps .
Can you see any of that in this Onkyo amp ?
What's the spectrum using spdif or toslink a
Archimago wrote:
> Thank you Ralph for your inquiry.
>
> 1. The gods are correct. TAS and Stereophile are written by gentlemen of
> distinction who are genetically devoid of earwax and hearing loss. I of
> course run a custom HDMI DAC because I'm worth it and could afford to
> hire one of the ch
ralphpnj wrote:
> Thank you so much for presenting a clear and very reasonable
> introduction and review to this wonderful new product. However I do have
> a few questions which I feel are very important.
>
> As you know the new audiophile standard for listening to computer based
> audio is the
Thank you so much for presenting a clear and very reasonable
introduction and review to this wonderful new product. However I do have
a few questions which I feel are very important.
As you know the new audiophile standard for listening to computer based
audio is the Mac Mini -> USB -> tube based
Greetings.
True to his word, Keaton Goulden-Eyre has reviewed another set of cables
for me... Along with some HDMI cable measurements...
Enjoy :-)
http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2013/11/guest-review-measurements-quantum-hdmi.html
Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
10 matches
Mail list logo
