cliveb;143602 Wrote:
> My take on the Transporter is that it's far more than that:
>
> - It's a digital preamp.
> - With a state of the art DAC.
> - And remote control.
> - Plus the functionality of a Squeezebox.
> - All in one convenient box.
-That connects wirelessly to your entire (digital)
cliveb;143602 Wrote:
> My take on the Transporter is that it's far more than that:
>
> - It's a digital preamp.
> - With a state of the art DAC.
> - And remote control.
> - Plus the functionality of a Squeezebox.
> - All in one convenient box.
You should add that it is also a high performance t
ceejay;143345 Wrote:
> > liffy99 Wrote:
> > So its just a bigger, better squeezebox ?"> >
> Yes
My take on the Transporter is that it's far more than that:
- It's a digital preamp.
- With a state of the art DAC.
- And remote control.
- Plus the functionality of a Squeezebox.
- All in one conve
liffy99;143335 Wrote:
>
>
> So its just a bigger, better squeezebox ?
>
>
Yes
>
> As I only have digital inputs on my amplifier am I wasting money on the
> DAC in the Transporter ?
>
Well you certainly won't benefit from the Transporters DAC if you are
only using its digital outputs.
Howev
