Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-05-10 Thread sbb
you could use a product like that: http://www.thomann.de/gb/samson_sconvert.htm this pro converter is supposed to work (and sound) quite well sbb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14322 View this

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-28 Thread cliveb
Rather than trying to guess/calculate the required attenuation, it's trivial to actually measure it: 1. Hook TP XLR outputs direct to power amp inputs. 2. SET INITIAL TP VOLUME TO ZERO!!! 3. Start playing something that you like to listen to loud (eg. Led Zeppelin/Metallica/etc). 4. Gradually

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-28 Thread darrenyeats
I base my experience on attenuators of the DAC1 which degrade the sound IMO, especially the 30db pad which is just egregious (Benchmark have removed the 30db pad option for the DAC2 ... grist to my mill!) So ... now I don't like putting any attenuators between the output of the source and the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-27 Thread Gandhi
+1 for Rothwell. They are very well built. The only downsides are their length and that they come in an annoyingly high-end looking box. :-) I used to use the -10dB XLR version with my Transporter, when technically I should have used -14dB. I never noticed anything detrimental with that. But

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-27 Thread Julf
Triplefun wrote: It seems I require a 5db XLR line attenuator (=20*log(1.63/3.00) = -5.3db). This seems rather low and is it really required? The value itself is correct, as the attenuation you need is not very much (and so little that I wouldn't bother with it) *if* you want to be able to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-27 Thread Mnyb
Julf wrote: The value itself is correct, as the attenuation you need is not very much (and so little that I wouldn't bother with it) *if* you want to be able to get full volume out of your system. That is a big if. If you find that you normally listen at much lower volumes, you might want to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-27 Thread Julf
Mnyb wrote: It would work fine without it to , but ipk3 based squeezeboxes (sb3 transporter etc ) has a very rare bug when they sometimes emit noise at full volume , you get it every 5 years or soo :) , fix is a xilink reset . Ah, yes, good point. To try to judge the real from the false

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-26 Thread Triplefun
I currently connect my transporter to the unbalanced input of my Audiolab 8200mb mono blocks using the unbalanced RCA connectors. I need to be careful on setting the volume and not go TOO loud. If I were to use the better quality XLR connectors I believe I will need an in line attenuator (or

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Required attenuation when connecting the Transporter XLR direct to an Amplifier

2014-04-26 Thread Mnyb
Its actually hard to do passsive atenuators with such low atenuation . Not that they will sound wrong but getting a matched pair ! You probably have o go with -10dB or nothing . I used rothwell atenuators when i had analog stuff i think they offer xlr too