-- tried to send this yesterday but SF ML refuses to get it, trying again --
Hello AUFS users.
It was my pleasure to double all your donations for AUFS, but you know, life is
changing, all good things have to come to an end. So, August 2010 is the last
month I'm going to double your donations.
Hi Tomas,
Tomas M:
> It was my pleasure to double all your donations for AUFS, but you know, life
> is changing, all good things have to come to an end. So, August 2010 is the
> last month I'm going to double your donations.
OK.
I really appriciate all your supports.
> For those folks who di
Hello Roopesh,
Roopesh:
> I am getting the following crash when I run heavy IO and delete branches at
> the same time. I have the attached patch applied to the july first week
> release. This patch was sent to me from another discussion in this mailing
> list. The config and disassembly of au_do_
T o n g:
> Ok, I meant to ask, are CONFIG_SYSFS and aufs module parameter brs
> compile-time feature, or it's controllable at mount commandline?
>
> $ dmesg | tail -1
> [1850101.149904] aufs au_opts_parse:1009:mount[12747]: unknown option
> brs=0
You are just confusing the mount option and the
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:32:48 +, T o n g wrote:
> Ok, hope I'm reporting a real bug this time -- aubrsync need to use real
> path:
>
> cd /dev/shm
> mkdir tmp_real
> ln -s tmp_real tmp
>
> % cd tmp
> /dev/shm/tmp
>
> rm -fr u rw ro_mid ro_bot
> mkdir u rw ro_mid ro_bot
> mount -t aufs -o br:
T o n g:
> If it should be "/dev/shm/tmp_real/u", why aubrsync is complaining that
> "/dev/shm/tmp/u" is not mounted here? IMHO, aubrsync should check the
> real path "/dev/shm/tmp_real/u" instead of "/dev/shm/tmp/u".
It might be your shell that returns "/dev/shm/tmp/u".
Try
$ cd /dev/shm/tmp/
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:32:33 +0900, sfjro wrote:
>> . . . aubrsync should check the
>> real path "/dev/shm/tmp_real/u" instead of "/dev/shm/tmp/u".
>
> It might be your shell that returns "/dev/shm/tmp/u". Try
> $ cd /dev/shm/tmp/u
> $ pwd
> $ /bin/pwd
> and send the result.
$ pwd
/dev/shm/tmp/u
T o n g:
> $ pwd
> /dev/shm/tmp/u
>
> $ /bin/pwd
> /dev/shm/tmp_real/u
ok.
> I think most people would use bash under Linux.
For intractive shell, I agree with you.
But for non-intractive shell, I am afraid many people installs dash or
something. Also some system maintenance script as aubrsync
On Tue August 10 2010, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> T o n g:
> > $ pwd
> > /dev/shm/tmp/u
> >
> > $ /bin/pwd
> > /dev/shm/tmp_real/u
>
> ok.
>
>
> > I think most people would use bash under Linux.
>
> For intractive shell, I agree with you.
> But for non-intractive shell, I am afraid ma
