On 25/11/15 21:45, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 at 20:52:57, Safa Alfulaij wrote:
Sentences or strings refers to the same thing. It's not necessary to
treat the translator as an end-user that shouldn't be aware/take care
of placeholders or accelerators. And doing that would combin
On 12/04/15 16:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
I like this idea. GPL3 is probably the best choice, given that we
already use the GPL for most projects.
Many PKGBUILDs won't even pass the threshold of originality (ie. not
copyrightable = Public Domain). And for patches, forcing (or encouraging)
a GPL
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I recently started working on a package blacklist for the official AUR
> which can e.g. be used to prevent people from uploading packages in the
> official repos to [unsupported] (cf. FS#12902 [1]). Patches can be found
> in the "pkg-blacklist" branch of my working
Denis Kobozev wrote:
>> The query in addsalt() function should have a WHERE Salt IS NULL. That's
>> nicer than checking it in php.
>>
> Is it faster/more memory efficient/more readable?
>
> Best,
> Denis.
>
Supposing that the script is only used once, it's irrelevant, since it
will need
to
Denis Kobozev wrote:
> Here's a patch with a script to salt passwords in the database. It
> assumes that there already a Salt field in the Users table. Hopefully
> it will integrated with Linas's patches.
>
> Linas, I think salted_hash() should not call md5() internally,
Loui Chang wrote:
> On Mon 19 Apr 2010 15:39 +0200, Linas wrote:
>
>> Loui Chang wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your support. Here goes an attempt.
>> I have mixed my suggestions with Denis idea of changing the hash algorithm
>> at the same time plus a few bi
Loui Chang wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestions. These are things that are best discussed
> on the aur-dev mailing list.
>
> Seems like you've put some thought into this. Why don't you submit a
> patch?
>
Thanks for your support. Here goes an attempt.
I have mixed my suggestions with Denis
Loui Chang wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestions. These are things that are best discussed
> on the aur-dev mailing list.
>
> Seems like you've put some thought into this. Why don't you submit a
> patch?
>
Thanks for your support. Here goes an attempt.
I have mixed my suggestions with Denis
