Le mercredi 10 novembre 2010 05:33:32, Andrea Scarpino a écrit :
Hi DEVs/TUs,
currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
[extra].
As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and I'd
like to move them to Unsupported.
If some DEV wants to
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Abstain: 6
Total: 23
Out of 28 TUs, 28% percent have participated and quorum has been established.
The
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 11:54:26 Sergej Pupykin wrote:
* alltray
* at
* centerim
* dia
* distcc
* dmenu
* elinks
* iptraf
* mailman
* mcrypt
* motion
* patchutils
* perl-*
* slmodem
* slmodem-utils
* squashfs-tools
* twinkle
* unarj
* w3m
* wmii
* wput
* xboard
*
At Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100,
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
If some TU wants to maintain a package in [community], please write the name
into the Candidate to [community] section, *DO NOT* cross it out. Or reply
to this mail.
I prefer to use following packages in binary form:
* alltray
*
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100, Andrea Scarpino
and...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi DEVs/TUs,
currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
[extra].
As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and
I'd like
to move them to Unsupported.
If some
On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Abstain: 6
Total: 23
Out of 28 TUs, 28% percent have participated and
Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100
schrieb Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org:
Hi DEVs/TUs,
currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages
in [extra].
As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and
I'd like to move them to Unsupported.
If some
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 21:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Xyne wrote:
And for those of you two lazy to calculate 23/28, it's ~82%, not 28% ;)
those of you two lazy
two
*sigh*
I'm revoking my mailing list privileges for the rest of the day. I'll see you
tomorrow.
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 21:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
On Wed 10 Nov 2010 21:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Abstain: 6
Hi DEVs/TUs,
currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
[extra].
As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and I'd like
to move them to Unsupported.
If some DEV wants to keep a package simply cross it out (adoption is not
required, but it
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 12:43:28 Heiko Baums wrote:
You should really think about that. There are many of the most
important, oldest and best known packages in this list like dia, ding,
xboard, eboard, epdfview, slmodem etc.
In other words, your list is likely the half of the distro.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:43:28 +0100, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:33:32 +0100
schrieb Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org:
Hi DEVs/TUs,
currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages
in [extra].
As member of the orphans team, I made
Hi all,
I'll start this discussion with an example of the problem.
I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community].
Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their
dependency to python2-sqlalchemy. This is handled quite nicely for
packages in the binary
Hello,
i want to upgrade these Packages:
* opie-server
* opie-client
* libpam-opie
I will also fix these Packages for amd64 Support.
Greetings
Betz Stefan
--
URL : http://blog.stefan-betz.net | http://www.stefan-betz.net
GPG : E188 933B BC00 723A 9DB0 0CD3 1398 E68B 6F33 567E
XMPP:
On 10 November 2010 17:15, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
I also want to address something else. I am disappointed that 5 TUs voted no
without anyone voicing any concerns during the discussion period. To abstain
from a vote indicates that you do not have an opinion one way or the other,
but
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:05:42PM +, Christopher Brannon wrote:
I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community].
Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their
dependency to python2-sqlalchemy. This is handled quite nicely for
packages in the binary
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Stefan J. Betz i...@stefan-betz.net wrote:
Hello,
i want to upgrade these Packages:
* opie-server
* opie-client
* libpam-opie
I will also fix these Packages for amd64 Support.
Greetings
Betz Stefan
--
URL : http://blog.stefan-betz.net |
On Wed 10 Nov 2010 14:05 +, Christopher Brannon wrote:
Hi all,
I'll start this discussion with an example of the problem.
I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community].
Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their
dependency to
Ray Rashif wrote:
On 10 November 2010 17:15, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
I also want to address something else. I am disappointed that 5 TUs voted no
without anyone voicing any concerns during the discussion period. To abstain
from a vote indicates that you do not have an opinion one way
I think this package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14908) should
be deleted. The maintainer orphaned it since it is deprecated and now
included in other package (see maintainer comment).
Thanks in advance
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Joao Cordeiro jlcorde...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14908) should
be deleted. The maintainer orphaned it since it is deprecated and now
included in other package (see maintainer comment).
Done, thanks.
Welcome aboard Kaiting
--
Angel Velásquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com
On 10 November 2010 12:15, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Abstain: 6
Total: 23
Out of 28 TUs, 28%
On Mon 18 Oct 2010 17:38 +0200, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:10 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 10.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Jakob Gruber:
On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period,
I'm posting the full text of the
Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:19:34 +
schrieb Joao Cordeiro jlcorde...@gmail.com:
I think this package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14908)
should be deleted. The maintainer orphaned it since it is deprecated
and now included in other package (see maintainer comment).
Thanks in
Am 2010-11-10 16:21:39 +0200, Evangelos Foutras schrieb:
Their current maintainer is active, and the packages you mention are
not marked as out-of-date.
I have sent a mail to the current maintainer, should he not respond in the
next 2 weeks i will report this issue again.
Greetings
Betz Stefan
Hi
I just discovered this package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43383
We have this plugin in the repos and the newer version is about to come in, so
nobody needs this package in the AUR. It even doesn't work, because doxygen is
needed in makedepends (this is also missing in the
Am 10.11.2010 11:33, schrieb Andrea Scarpino:
Hi DEVs/TUs,
currently we have 700 (counting both arches and any) orphans packages in
[extra].
As member of the orphans team, I made a list[1] of these packages and I'd
like
to move them to Unsupported.
If some DEV wants to keep a package
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 22:27:43 Stefan Husmann wrote:
why are sawfish and rep-gtk on the list, but not librep? I think these
packages belong together and should be maintained by the same person. I
would like to maintain them in [community].
Because librep is maintained by Jurgen, but I
31 matches
Mail list logo
