Hi,
I did this PKGBUILD for graphviz, and I think it is OK. But I would like
someone more experienced (I never did a PKGBUILD) took a look and tell me if
it is really OK and I can upload it to aur.
I based it on this sample found on the wiki:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Perl_Policy#Sampl
On 13.11.2010 17:54, Antonio Lucas wrote:
> I did this PKGBUILD for graphviz, and I think it is OK. But I would like
> someone more experienced (I never did a PKGBUILD) took a look and tell me if
> it is really OK and I can upload it to aur.
You should:
- move everything after make into package()
On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Jan Steffens
wrote:
2010/11/11 Ángel Velásquez :
+1 cloaks I need one too and some new TUs are needing cloaks too :-)
Okay, I'm making a list for Aaron of TUs or devs who want a cloak. I
need the IRC nicks. Please answer to this mail or Jabber
(jan.steff..
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:06:13PM +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
> You should:
> - move everything after make into package()
> - remove || return 1
> - replace $startdir/{pkg,src} by ${pkg,src}dir
> - remove the 3rd line (useless comment)
>
> That should look similar to this http://paste.xinu.at
Am 13.11.2010 17:54, schrieb Antonio Lucas:
> Hi,
>
> I did this PKGBUILD for graphviz, and I think it is OK. But I would like
> someone more experienced (I never did a PKGBUILD) took a look and tell me if
> it is really OK and I can upload it to aur.
>
> I based it on this sample found on the wi
Am 13.11.2010 18:33, schrieb Stefan Husmann:
> Maybe arch should be 'any'?
>
(answering to myself after testing) Yes, it should be!
Le samedi 13 novembre 2010 12:15:35, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:06:13PM +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
> > You should:
> > - move everything after make into package()
> > - remove || return 1
> > - replace $startdir/{pkg,src} by ${pkg,src}dir
> > - remove the 3rd line (
2010/11/12 Lukáš Jirkovský :
> On 11 November 2010 22:16, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> 2010/11/11 Ángel Velásquez :
>>>
>>> +1 cloaks I need one too and some new TUs are needing cloaks too :-)
>>>
>>
>> Okay, I'm making a list for Aaron of TUs or devs who want a cloak. I
>> need the IRC nicks. Please an
Am 13.11.2010 19:04, schrieb Stéphane Gaudreault:
> Le samedi 13 novembre 2010 12:15:35, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:06:13PM +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>> You should:
>>> - move everything after make into package()
>>> - remove || return 1
>>> - replace $startdir/{p
hi everyone,
thanks the quickly response for all (and sorry the top posting =p)
I modified the PKGBUILD based on your suggestions. I added the graphviz
package as a dependecy (I have forgoten that because I already had it
installed). I do not know the diference between makedepends and depends
arr
On Saturday 13 November 2010 14:46:30 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> Nice, today we have 291 orphans packages in [extra] (they were 352 three
> days ago). 62 will be moved to [community]. 127 to AUR.
>
> I didn't expect this success. I can start moving them today if you agree.
>
> Full lists:
>
>
> a
I think we should start a campaign for
converting the lib32 and bit32 pkgs to
new multilib compliant format.
So instead if downloading the 32bit
version from the i686 repos build
the package from source whit -m32
and gcc-multilib.
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help him achiev
On 14/11/10 06:44, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Everything moved except mailman which I want to keep in [extra] and ding which
Stefan wants to maintain in [community].
TUs please adopt your packages and thanks!
If mailman has someone that wants to maintain it in [community] I would
highly recommen
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 22:46 +0200, jesse jaara wrote:
> I think we should start a campaign for
> converting the lib32 and bit32 pkgs to
> new multilib compliant format.
> So instead if downloading the 32bit
> version from the i686 repos build
> the package from source whit -m32
> and gcc-multilib.
14 matches
Mail list logo
