qtile-new-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40921
bavardage-qtile-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23760
The first, package maintainer admitted he wrongly uploaded it, he
currently maintains qtile-git
The second, I have no idea where its from, but its circa 2009,
references
>
> qtile-new-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40921
> bavardage-qtile-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23760
>
> The first, package maintainer admitted he wrongly uploaded it, he
> currently maintains qtile-git
>
> The second, I have no idea where its from, but its circa 20
Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten
votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I
would ask. --Kaiting.
--
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
>
> Deleted the first one, emailed the maintainer about the 'bavardage' one. It
> has six votes for some reason so I'll give him a day or two to see if it's
> okay to remove. --Kaiting.
>
Deleted. --Kaiting.
--
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 11/18/10 03:30, Kaiting Chen wrote:
Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten
votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I
would ask. --Kaiting.
No.
I looked to see where this was documented on the wiki and the closest I
foun
Jfhkkgd
I
R
On 18.11.2010 10.44, "Kaiting Chen" wrote:
>>
>> Deleted the first one, emailed the maintainer about the 'bavardage' one.
It
>> has six votes for some reason so I'll give him a day or two to see if
it's
>> okay to remove. --Kaiting.
>>
>
> Deleted. --Kaiting.
>
> --
> Kiwis and Limes:
Btw, there is a dude who's working on a git-backend-based AUR.
pretty c^w very ambitious project, if you're interested in the topic,
check him out.
I was pretty sure he had a thread on the community contributions
section of the forums, and i know myself and louipc have made posts in
the thread, but
Hi all,
I'm planning to package pf_ring for archlinux.
pf_ring has several components:
- Common kernel module
- Several kernel drivers for some network cards
- Userland lib and includes
- Some pf_ring capable softwares (tcpdump, libpcap, snort...)
I'm wondering how to split this into sev
Hi,
I packaged python-libgit2 but the upstream is dead. And a new Python
binding was started by the same team than libgit2 itself. It's named pygit2.
So I wonder whether I keep the same package but point to the new
repository (and thus follow the Python naming convention) or I keep the
upstr
Gwenn Gueguen writes:
> I'm wondering how to split this into several packages...
>
> Does the following look OK?
>
> - pfring-module-svn for kernel module
>
> - pfring-driver-xxx-svn for kernel drivers (one per card driver:
>e1000e igb tg3 ...)
>
> - pfring-svn for userland (lib and includ
Am Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:55:20 +
schrieb Christopher Brannon :
> That looks fine. Are you thinking of writing a split PKGBUILD? If
> so, realize that the AUR doesn't support them. You will need to
> write a separate PKGBUILD for each component.
There's a workaround for this even if it would
Hi,
Please remove libreoffice-langpack-ja[1] due to the libreoffice-ja is
provided on extra.
And I think many of libreoffice l10n packages on AUR are unnecessary anymore.
Thanks
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42140
--
HASHIMOTO, Masato
Am Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:48:26 +0900
schrieb Masato Hashimoto :
> Hi,
>
> Please remove libreoffice-langpack-ja[1] due to the libreoffice-ja is
> provided on extra.
>
> And I think many of libreoffice l10n packages on AUR are unnecessary
> anymore.
>
> Thanks
>
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/pa
On Thursday 18 November 2010 14:58:30 Heiko Baums wrote:
> As I see it, every libreoffice* package can now be removed from AUR.
Not every. And already done.
--
Andrea Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
On 11/18/2010 10:30 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten
votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I
would ask. --Kaiting.
no. we can't support unsupported software :P
--
Ionuț
I think all of these packages should be deleted:
iolang (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42613)
dupe of iolanguage
vimspell (http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=465)
upstream itself advises to stop using it since vim7 has a better native
spellchecker
mkvtoolnix-patched (http
Ray Rashif wrote:
> Granted, this is a little different since it's the first time we've
> had something like a "Junior Developer", AFAICR. However, I believe we
> should give them benefit of the doubt when recommended by a developer.
> If anything (bad) happens, the brokeit panic button sends a jo
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:58:16 -0500
Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >
> > ... From what I've heard I think they're capable of pushing these
> > packages. If anyone has any concerns about Junior Dev's pushing
> > binaries I'll be happy to audit all of their PKGBUILD's so long as
> > they send me an email abou
I just adopted and updated zint.
Zint checks for qt and installs both zint and zint-qt if it is found.
Otherwise, it just installs zint. I don't believe this to be the optimal
approach. Even if I have qt installed, it doesn't necessarily means that I
want zint-qt. Despite that fact, I don't want t
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 11:34:11 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> Hi TUs,
> we are here again. After the success with [extra] (DEVs adopted ~80
> packages, TUs ~60), I want to reduce the number of orphans packages in
> [community]. Actually, they are 84 (82, I just adopted two...).
>
> The list is her
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:40:38PM +, Joao Cordeiro wrote:
> Zint checks for qt and installs both zint and zint-qt if it is found.
> Otherwise, it just installs zint. I don't believe this to be the optimal
> approach. Even if I have qt installed, it doesn't necessarily means that I
> want zint-
Hi,
I am going to maintain imgtops (http://imgtops.sourceforge.net/), which
is a graphic format conversion tool, useful to make large *.{eps,jpg,...} files
intended for inclusion into LaTeX fit the http://arXiv.org standards.
I don't think it exists anywhere in Arch, but just to be
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:17:38PM -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> I am going to maintain imgtops (http://imgtops.sourceforge.net/), which
> is a graphic format conversion tool, useful to make large *.{eps,jpg,...}
> files
> intended for inclusion into LaTeX fit the http://arXiv.org standards.
Am 18.11.2010 09:30, schrieb Kaiting Chen:
> Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten
> votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I
> would ask. --Kaiting.
>
I think if we should discuss this if the AUR helper does not hide the bu
On 11/18/2010 09:00 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 18.11.2010 09:30, schrieb Kaiting Chen:
Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten
votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I
would ask. --Kaiting.
I think if we should discuss t
On 11/18/2010 02:03 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/18/2010 09:00 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 18.11.2010 09:30, schrieb Kaiting Chen:
Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have
over ten
votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I
thought I
would ask.
Am 18.11.2010 16:12, schrieb Joao Cordeiro:
> I think all of these packages should be deleted:
>
> iolang (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42613)
> dupe of iolanguage
>
removed
> vimspell ()
> upstream itself advises to stop using it since vim7 has a better native
> spellchecker
>
remo
Am 18.11.2010 20:31, schrieb Matthew Gyurgyik:
> On 11/18/2010 02:03 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>> On 11/18/2010 09:00 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
>>> Am 18.11.2010 09:30, schrieb Kaiting Chen:
Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten
votes and qualify, but I ne
On 18 November 2010 16:30, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten
> votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I
> would ask. --Kaiting.
Good that you asked. Otherwise, you could've made a wrong move.
1) AU
On 18 November 2010 21:43, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:55:20 +
> schrieb Christopher Brannon :
>
>> That looks fine. Are you thinking of writing a split PKGBUILD? If
>> so, realize that the AUR doesn't support them. You will need to
>> write a separate PKGBUILD for each comp
2010/11/18 Hervé Cauwelier :
> Hi,
>
> I packaged python-libgit2 but the upstream is dead. And a new Python binding
> was started by the same team than libgit2 itself. It's named pygit2.
>
> So I wonder whether I keep the same package but point to the new repository
> (and thus follow the Python na
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 04:43:15AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> So, IMO, it is best that such tools, regardless of the extent of
> features, be left in AUR. I myself use slurpy for upload, and rarely
> do I use the search/download features :)
I basically agree. The AUR is unsupported and has nothing
Hey all,
Package sabnzbd-svn can be removed from AUR, as sabnzbd is now using bzr.
Regards,
jordz
>
> Package sabnzbd-svn can be removed from AUR, as sabnzbd is now using bzr.
>
Done, please provide link next time. --Kaiting.
--
Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Am Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:20:01 +0100
schrieb Lukas Fleischer :
> I basically agree. The AUR is unsupported and has nothing to do with
> Arch Linux or the [community] repository.
Since when doesn't have AUR anything to do with Arch Linux or
[community] repo? AUR is totally Arch Linux related and can
Can you delete my last uploaded paclage kernel-rc. Name should be kernel26-rc.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43699
Regards,
--
Sébastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Seblu wrote:
> Can you delete my last uploaded paclage kernel-rc. Name should be kernel26-rc.
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43699
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Sébastien Luttringer
> www.seblu.net
>
What's the difference between this and the kernel26-mainli
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Seblu wrote:
> What's the difference between this and the kernel26-mainline package?
Mainline follow the mailine, mine follow only rc. For example, i also
have a kernel26-next. This give me the choice, at
On Fri 19 Nov 2010 04:43 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 16:30, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> > Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have
> > over ten votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary
> > form so I thought I would ask. --Kaiting.
>
> So, IMO,
On 19/11/10 10:54, Loui Chang wrote:
On Fri 19 Nov 2010 04:43 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 18 November 2010 16:30, Kaiting Chen wrote:
Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have
over ten votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary
form so I thought I would as
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Seblu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Seblu wrote:
>
>> What's the difference between this and the kernel26-mainline package?
> Mainline follow the mailine, mine follow only rc. For example, i
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Seblu wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Seblu wrote:
>>
>>> What's the difference between this and the kernel26-mainline package?
>> M
hi, please delete this package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43683
hdf-eos5 contain it, therefore not necessary
thanks
--
Xavier Corredor Llano
Bogotá - Colombia
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:28:31PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > I basically agree. The AUR is unsupported and has nothing to do with
> > Arch Linux or the [community] repository.
>
> Since when doesn't have AUR anything to do with Arch Linux or
> [community] repo? AUR is totally Arch Linux relate
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Xavier Corredor Llano
wrote:
> hi, please delete this package:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43683
>
> hdf-eos5 contain it, therefore not necessary
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Xavier Corredor Llano
> Bogotá - Colombia
>
Done, thanks.
45 matches
Mail list logo
