2010/12/10 Андрей Григорьев :
> Hi.
>
> I was maintainer of the pyclutter package.
Thank you for following up.
> Can't build python-clutter, marked it as outdated. Also, there are
> pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk packages in AUR, it would be nice to
> keep the overall naming scheme of python bin
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Justin Davis wrote:
> I don't know if it would help but I have created an ocaml module that
> you could use to interface with libalpm. The github repo is at
> https://github.com/juster/ocaml-alpm but it isn't completely finished.
> It works and is comprehensive bu
I don't know if it would help but I have created an ocaml module that
you could use to interface with libalpm. The github repo is at
https://github.com/juster/ocaml-alpm but it isn't completely finished.
It works and is comprehensive but has no docs and no Makefile.
Making packages from the AUR is
rxvt-unicode in extra has 256 color support built with it which made
the deleted package redundant.
You know, this is one of the situations where I am kind of embarrassed I
even brought this up. I can solve this problem much more cleanly with
bacman, and it will clean up a number of aspects of the build process.
Ok, do me a favor, and next time I poke my head out, don't remember mas as a
fool :)
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 16:49 +0100, Xyne wrote:
> keenerd wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Nicky726 wrote:
> > > been told by the bot, that selinux-flex has a binary
> > > (selinux-flex/flex- arch.patch.gz), which is a gziped patch. Guess
> > > I can ungzip it, though as this package is j
On Thu 09 Dec 2010 09:54 -0500, keenerd wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Xyne wrote:
> > The issue as I see it is that you presented the idea on this list for
> > discussion but didn't care to follow that discussion until a conclusion was
> > reached.
>
> It seemed discussion had petered
2010/12/9 Андрей Григорьев
> Hi.
>
> I was maintainer of the pyclutter package.
>
> Can't build python-clutter, marked it as outdated. Also, there are
> pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk packages in AUR, it would be nice to
> keep the overall naming scheme of python bindings for clutter. I have
> n
Hi.
I was maintainer of the pyclutter package.
Can't build python-clutter, marked it as outdated. Also, there are
pyclutter-gst and pyclutter-gtk packages in AUR, it would be nice to
keep the overall naming scheme of python bindings for clutter. I have
nothing against if someone else will maintai
It still needs a lot of refinement, but here is the ocaml febootstrap_pacman
module if you are interested:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=febootstrap.git;a=blob;f=febootstrap_pacman.ml;h=5076d85c76a428b7275b94c6c416c2694bfe6bd4;hb=HEAD
The more I look at it the more I see better ways of handling the si
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Xyne wrote:
> Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>
> > > Ok, the process of building the libguestfs virtual machine image,
> called
> > > "supermin", must be executed as an unprivileged user during the
> libguestfs
> > > make process. The supermin build process is managed by a
Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > Ok, the process of building the libguestfs virtual machine image, called
> > "supermin", must be executed as an unprivileged user during the libguestfs
> > make process. The supermin build process is managed by a program called
> > febootstrap, I had to write an additiona
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Xyne wrote:
>
> Ah, just saw the previous message...
>
> Ok, done too (I think).
>
>
you forgot to delete [9.1] and [10.1]:
[9.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22894
[10.1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12090
Everything else is fine. Thank y
Joao Cordeiro wrote:
> Was I supposed to create a new mail instead of replying to the previous one?
>
> Anyway,
> powertop-svn [1], lgob-svn [2], gnuradio-svn [3] and pcmanfm-svn [4] all
> have been abandoned upstream and have git package.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
> Joao Cordeiro
>
> [1] http:/
keenerd wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Xyne wrote:
> > The issue as I see it is that you presented the idea on this list for
> > discussion but didn't care to follow that discussion until a conclusion was
> > reached.
>
> It seemed discussion had petered out.
>
> > Some TUs objected t
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:01 AM, jesse jaara wrote:
>
>> 2010/12/9 Thomas S Hatch
>>
>> >
>> > You see, the build process needs to create a tiny virtual machine image,
>> > (the image is quite remarkable, a vm image for Arch in less tha
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:01 AM, jesse jaara wrote:
> 2010/12/9 Thomas S Hatch
>
> >
> > You see, the build process needs to create a tiny virtual machine image,
> > (the image is quite remarkable, a vm image for Arch in less than 50K) but
> > the process to create the image requires that all pac
On 09.12.2010 15:18, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Hehehe, i have seen the movement of popular packages to [community]
> (SVEN STOLE OUR PACKAGES!!!). But i didn't really care that much about
> it. I mean anyone can put in community what they like ( as TU ) ;)
>
SVEN WHO?
Nevertheless, I think popula
2010/12/9 Thomas S Hatch
>
> You see, the build process needs to create a tiny virtual machine image,
> (the image is quite remarkable, a vm image for Arch in less than 50K) but
> the process to create the image requires that all packages for the image be
> available as binary downloads from a ma
I have an odd request with regards to an aur package - augeas:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18533
I have been working toward porting an extremely powerful virtualization
application to ArchLinux - Libguestfs: http://libguestfs.org/
The libguestfs package will also enable a number of o
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Xyne wrote:
> The issue as I see it is that you presented the idea on this list for
> discussion but didn't care to follow that discussion until a conclusion was
> reached.
It seemed discussion had petered out.
> Some TUs objected to the bot and I think you should
Hehehe, i have seen the movement of popular packages to [community]
(SVEN STOLE OUR PACKAGES!!!). But i didn't really care that much about
it. I mean anyone can put in community what they like ( as TU ) ;)
--
Jelle van der Waa
On 12/09/10 at 12:52am, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Stefan Husmann > wrote:
>
>> Am 04.12.2010 16:40, schrieb Joao Cordeiro:
>>
>> Done, many thanks!
>>
>
> Some more:
>
> (... ... ...)
>
Was I supposed to create a new mail instead of replying to the prev
Xyne wrote:
> Well, the English language disagrees with you and so does my spell-checker. :P
I retract that statement. Only my spell-checker disagrees. I thought I had
checked it online but now I see that multiple variants are acceptable: bylaw,
by-law, byelaw, bye-law.
Apparently my email spell
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Joao Cordeiro wrote:
> libreoffice-bin [1] - dupe of package in extra.
>
> pyclutter-svn [2] is deprecated since pyclutter now uses git (and there is a
> git package in aur). Also, pyclutter [3] and python-clutter [4] are dupes.
> First has better naming but the se
Kaiting Chen wrote:
> I'm nitpicking here because we're pretty much at the final edit: Why do we
> have this redundant construct? "aur-general mailing list (aur-general)".
"aur-general" is an abbreviation of "the aur-general mailing list". I
originally wrote something along the lines of "hereafte
26 matches
Mail list logo
