On 11.12.2010 03:15, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
This is the official thread of the Arch holiday madness! nominations!
Please read the article located on rollingrelease.com or archlinux.org
Can't find one on archlinux.org :p
before posting nominations here.
Here we go:
mpdscribble [0]
* 280
Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-12-11 03:15:36 +0100:
This is the official thread of the Arch holiday madness! nominations!
Please read the article located on rollingrelease.com or archlinux.org
before posting nominations here.
There's no such article on archlinux.org and
Dear TUs,
Like Gaëtan and Stéphane, I am a (French-speaking) junior Developer,
and I was given recently access to the [community] repos. I have no
plan to add packages to [community] for the moment, I am currently
concentrating on checking whether Haskell-based packages are
compatible with the
For some reasons i replaced kernel26-slk with kernel26-bede
why ?:
the original naming is because it is inspired by the slackware config, but now
its just some settings which are different from the stock arch kernel which
make my linux experience nicer than with the default.
so could
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-12-11 03:15:36 +0100:
This is the official thread of the Arch holiday madness! nominations!
Please read the article located on rollingrelease.com or archlinux.org
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:44:29 -0600
Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-12-11 03:15:36
+0100:
This is the official thread of the Arch holiday madness!
On 12/11/2010 06:51 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:44:29 -0600
Thomas Dziedzicgos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-12-11 03:15:36
+0100:
This is the
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
so could kernel26-slk and nvidia-slk be replaced by:
Deleted. :)
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12/11/2010 06:51 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:44:29 -0600
Thomas Dziedzicgos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts
Hi TUs,
please delete rekonq+i18n-git [1] because locales are already provided by
rekonq-git [2] package.
Thanks in advance
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37865
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37865[2]
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22846
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alessio Sergi ase...@archlinux.us wrote:
Hi TUs,
please delete rekonq+i18n-git [1] because locales are already provided by
rekonq-git [2] package.
Thanks in advance
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37865
On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
42!
Yup, that's right. 42. Vote wisely, gentlemen. We may
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
On Fri 10 Dec 2010 15:15 +0100, Xyne wrote:
Loui Chang wrote:
If the patch is large then what's the problem with compressing it?
I would argue that we should not have large patches applied to Arch, or
AUR packages at all. If there is enough patching, that constitues a
fork, and we
Rémy,
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear TUs,
Like Gaëtan and Stéphane, I am a (French-speaking) junior Developer,
and I was given recently access to the [community] repos. I have no
plan to add packages to [community] for the moment, I am
On 12 December 2010 04:05, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
good news. This is the first time, since i'm a TU, when we reached 100%
quorum.
First time in the history of the AUR as we know it. Congrats and welcome!
Le samedi 11 décembre 2010 21:05:42, Ionuț Bîru a écrit :
On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
the 5 days discussion period have ended.
Am 11.12.2010 03:15, schrieb Thomas Dziedzic:
This is the official thread of the Arch holiday madness! nominations!
Please read the article located on rollingrelease.com or archlinux.org
before posting nominations here.
Hello,
I made an announcement on the german speaking Arch Linux forum
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:44:42 +0100 Stefan Husmann
stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 11.12.2010 03:15, schrieb Thomas Dziedzic:
This is the official thread of the Arch holiday madness!
nominations! Please read the article located on rollingrelease.com
or archlinux.org before posting
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:42:04 +0100 Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear TUs,
Like Gaëtan and Stéphane, I am a (French-speaking) junior Developer,
and I was given recently access to the [community] repos. I have no
plan to add packages to [community] for the moment, I am
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:21:53 -0500 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
Hi,
On 2010-12-12 05:18 +0800 (49:7)
Ray Rashif wrote:
On 12 December 2010 04:05, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
good news. This is the first time, since i'm a TU, when we reached 100%
quorum.
First time in the history of the AUR as we know it. Congrats and welcome!
42!
Yup,
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
* gets out some snacks and sits down in his designated TU comfy-chair *
Oh man that's a great idea. Why don't I have a designated TU comfy-chair?
Welcome to the team Dave. --Kaiting.
--
Kiwis and Limes:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU
bylaws:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendmentoldid=124557
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
these include:
* enabling a vote to pass in the absence of
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU
bylaws:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendmentoldid=124557
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
these
On 12/11/10 22:21, Xyne wrote:
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
these include:
* enabling a vote to pass in the absence of quorum when more than 50% of active
TUs have voted YES
* enabling a vote to fail in the absence of quorum when 50% or more of
26 matches
Mail list logo
