Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:40 +0100, Xyne wrote: > Evangelos Foutras wrote: > > > lol u mad bro > > Sorry, this isn't Archan. Could have fooled me.

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Brad Fanella
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Peter Lewis wrote: > Where's Xyne when you need him? > > I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P > Nope. Sorry. You're wrong. :-P Grammarians have come to the consensus that it is alright to end a sentence with a preposition, in cases such as "What did yo

Re: [aur-general] Anybody want apvlv?

2011-01-11 Thread Brad Fanella
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > > Nah, umd in this case is an ebook file format, so you don't need a PSP > toolchain ;) > Brad, I think you solved this already? > Yes, I have solved this. I apologize for my ignorance; I was not aware of the UMD ebook format (for mobile devi

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Xyne
Evangelos Foutras wrote: > lol u mad bro Sorry, this isn't Archan.

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Xyne wrote: > Peter Lewis wrote: > >> > Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of? >> >> Where's Xyne when you need him? >> >> I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P > > Meh, I disagree with the rule not to end sentences with a preposition. > Sometimes it's

Re: [aur-general] Anybody want apvlv?

2011-01-11 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 01/11/2011 08:17 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 11 January 2011 05:10, Brad Fanella wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 9 January 2011 03:27, Brad Fanella wrote: So with the recent release of apvlv 0.1.0, I have decided to drop maintaining it. I believe it now suppor

Re: [aur-general] Anybody want apvlv?

2011-01-11 Thread Ray Rashif
On 11 January 2011 05:10, Brad Fanella wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: >> On 9 January 2011 03:27, Brad Fanella wrote: >>> So with the recent release of apvlv 0.1.0, I have decided to drop >>> maintaining it. >>> >>> I believe it now supports UMD file reading of some

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Xyne
Peter Lewis wrote: > > Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of? > > Where's Xyne when you need him? > > I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P Meh, I disagree with the rule not to end sentences with a preposition. Sometimes it's just the most natural way to phrase it. Afaik, it only g

[aur-general] TU Application -Thomas Hatch: Voting period

2011-01-11 Thread Xyne
The voting period for Thomas Hatch's application has begun: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=46 Please make your way to the AUR and vote. :)

[aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Voting Period

2011-01-11 Thread Xyne
Kaiting Chen wrote: > We should probably go ahead and vote to get this taken care of. --Kaiting. The voting period has begun. TUs, please vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=45

Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Discussion Period

2011-01-11 Thread Kaiting Chen
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: > Don't do anything else when typing a mail... > We should wait for another TU to agree with that, not vote for another > one... > We should probably go ahead and vote to get this taken care of. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaito

Re: [aur-general] jack-audio-connection-kit-dbus removal

2011-01-11 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:27:29 +0100 Daniele Paolella wrote: > Please delete the package jack-audio-connection-kit-dbus > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22535). I uploaded the new > release as jack-dbus > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45254), for consistency > with jack in [ex

[aur-general] jack-audio-connection-kit-dbus removal

2011-01-11 Thread Daniele Paolella
Please delete the package jack-audio-connection-kit-dbus (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22535). I uploaded the new release as jack-dbus (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45254), for consistency with jack in [extra], jack2 and jack2-dbus in [community].

Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Discussion Period

2011-01-11 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:23:40 +0100 Thorsten Töpper wrote: > I guess we should, let's vote for another one to agree before starting > one and do a mistake with that ;-) Don't do anything else when typing a mail... We should wait for another TU to agree with that, not vote for another one... -- J

Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Discussion Period

2011-01-11 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:19:28 + Peter Lewis wrote: > On Sunday 12 December 2010 03:21:30 Xyne wrote: > > The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section > > of the TU bylaws: > > > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124557 > > > > The change

Re: [aur-general] Anybody want apvlv?

2011-01-11 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 14:21:55 -0600 Brad Fanella wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Stefan Husmann > wrote: > > Am 08.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Brad Fanella: > >> So with the recent release of apvlv 0.1.0, I have decided to drop > >> maintaining it. > >> > >> I believe it now supports UMD file r

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:46:07 +0100 Luca Bennati wrote: > nano-wrap https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20596 -> outdated, > orphan, functionality included in official repos Done. -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E4

[aur-general] Delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Luca Bennati
nano-wrap https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20596 -> outdated, orphan, functionality included in official repos

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

2011-01-11 Thread Dave Reisner
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:12:42PM +0100, notizblock wrote: > hi, > i reuploaded the following packages using a python2-pkgname naming scheme: > -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37035 > -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22977 > -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29765 > -

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: pysztaki

2011-01-11 Thread Dave Reisner
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:00:34PM +0100, György Balló wrote: > Accidentally, I uploaded this package in wrong name, please delete it. > The correct name is pysztaki-svn. Sorry. > > City-busz Deleted with great vengeance and furious anger. thanks, d

[aur-general] Deletion Request

2011-01-11 Thread notizblock
hi, i reuploaded the following packages using a python2-pkgname naming scheme: -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37035 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22977 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29765 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19942 please delete the above

[aur-general] Delete request: pysztaki

2011-01-11 Thread György Balló
Accidentally, I uploaded this package in wrong name, please delete it. The correct name is pysztaki-svn. Sorry. City-busz

Re: [aur-general] TU Application -Thomas Hatch

2011-01-11 Thread Laurent Carlier
Le mardi 11 janvier 2011 11:16:45, Peter Lewis a écrit : > On Wednesday 05 January 2011 19:40:53 Xyne wrote: > > Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > > Xyne has agreed to sponsor me as a TU. I am very excited at the > > > potential opportunity to become more directly involved with the > > > development of Arc

Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Discussion Period

2011-01-11 Thread Peter Lewis
On Sunday 12 December 2010 03:21:30 Xyne wrote: > The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the > TU bylaws: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124557 > > The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. > Briefly,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application -Thomas Hatch

2011-01-11 Thread Peter Lewis
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 19:40:53 Xyne wrote: > Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > Xyne has agreed to sponsor me as a TU. I am very excited at the potential > > opportunity to become more directly involved with the development of > > ArchLinux. > > I have indeed agreed to sponsor Thomas, so here I am s

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.

2011-01-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Adopted fcgiwrap and spawn-fcgi.

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Peter Lewis
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 00:35:18 Brad Fanella wrote: > 2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee : > > On a related note: don't you guys > > sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =) > > Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of? Where's Xyne when you need him? I think you mean "sleep of wh

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2011-01-11 Thread Cédric Girard
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > 2011/1/11 Cédric Girard : > > What was the name of these packages ? > > Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their > names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur > respectively. > Thank you.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2011-01-11 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:54 AM, speps wrote: > Hi, can you please orphan libxml? > ==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15850 Done. :)

[aur-general] Orphan Request

2011-01-11 Thread speps
Hi, can you please orphan libxml? ==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15850 The maintainer seems to be inactive since May 2009 The are 3 comments suggesting the x86_64 addition, the last one on August 2010. Also, i need it to work for my libglade-old. Thanks