Hello archers,
for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to
share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess
it can’t hurt to have it reviewed here by more experienced users
before submitting.
Thanks for your opinion, Philipp
[1] http://luagraph.luaforge.net/
Le 14/01/2011 10:21, Philipp Gesang a écrit :
Hello archers,
for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to
share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess
it can’t hurt to have it reviewed here by more experienced users
before submitting.
Thanks for your opinio
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Philipp Gesang
wrote:
> Hello archers,
>
> for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to
> share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess
> it can’t hurt to have it reviewed here by more experienced users
> before submitting.
-
Excerpts from Philipp Gesang's message of 2011-01-14 09:21:57 +0100:
> Hello archers,
>
> for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to
> share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess
> it can’t hurt to have it reviewed here by more experienced users
> before su
On 2011-01-14 <09:39:28>, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from Philipp Gesang's message of 2011-01-14 09:21:57 +0100:
> > Hello archers,
> >
> > for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to
> > share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess
> > it can’t hur
On 2011-01-14 <10:30:45>, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Philipp Gesang
> wrote:
> > Hello archers,
> >
> > for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to
> > share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess
> > it can’t hurt to have it
Excerpts from Philipp Gesang's message of 2011-01-14 10:06:29 +0100:
> On 2011-01-14 <09:39:28>, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > Excerpts from Philipp Gesang's message of 2011-01-14 09:21:57 +0100:
> > > Hello archers,
> > >
> > > for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to
> > >
On 14/01/11 11:28, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Might be, but I see that the source is available, hence it's possible to
> build and install instead of downloading binaries. Building from source
> is the preferred way. If the source is available and you download
> binaries anyway you should postfix
Hi guys,
the AUR user palmfron has recently flagged the package "haskell-haskcore"
out-of-date, because the PKGBUILD is broken. It cannot be compiled,
because it depends on other packages that no longer exist:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20383
Now, there is disagreement among the
On 14/01/11 19:45, Peter Simons wrote:
Is there some sort of consensus among AUR maintainers how to deal with
that kind of situation? If an AUR package is current, so to speak, but it
doesn't compile, then what should be done with it?
I'd say that is what the comment section is for.
Allan
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:56, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 14/01/11 19:45, Peter Simons wrote:
>>
>> Is there some sort of consensus among AUR maintainers how to deal with
>> that kind of situation? If an AUR package is current, so to speak, but it
>> doesn't compile, then what should be done with it?
Excerpts from Evangelos Foutras's message of 2011-01-14 10:33:26 +0100:
> On 14/01/11 11:28, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > Might be, but I see that the source is available, hence it's possible to
> > build and install instead of downloading binaries. Building from source
> > is the preferred way. I
Okay, since there was a bit of discussion about new packages, I thought
I'd maybe make some noise about one of mine.
I've written a software-defined radio receiver called lysdr, and (so
far) I don't think there's anything like it in AUR ;-) What is it?
Well, it's a radio receiver, of sorts. Idea
Am 14.01.2011 10:45, schrieb Peter Simons:
> Hi guys,
>
> the AUR user palmfron has recently flagged the package "haskell-haskcore"
> out-of-date, because the PKGBUILD is broken. It cannot be compiled,
> because it depends on other packages that no longer exist:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/pac
Hi everyone,
Same as yesterday, but now regarding ttf-consolas: can someone please
delete that package [1]; it has no maintainer and ttf-vista-fonts [2]
provides the same font (including other variants).
Regards,
Marcel
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35124
[2] http://aur.archlinux.
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 20:28 +0100, Marcel Korpel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Same as yesterday, but now regarding ttf-consolas: can someone please
> delete that package [1]; it has no maintainer and ttf-vista-fonts [2]
> provides the same font (including other variants).
>
> Regards,
> Marcel
>
>
Dear TUs,
I am preparing an update of python-matplotlib to version 1.0.1. This package
supports multiple backends for rendering graphics and plotting windows. So
far, our PKGBUILD supported QTAgg which requires the old qt3. Considering that
qt3 has no future, I wonder if it is still necessary t
On 14.01.2011 20:10, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 14.01.2011 10:45, schrieb Peter Simons:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> the AUR user palmfron has recently flagged the package "haskell-haskcore"
>> out-of-date, because the PKGBUILD is broken. It cannot be compiled,
>> because it depends on other packages that no
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
wrote:
> I am preparing an update of python-matplotlib to version 1.0.1. This package
> supports multiple backends for rendering graphics and plotting windows. So
> far, our PKGBUILD supported QTAgg which requires the old qt3. Considering that
Le 14 janvier 2011 16:47:39, Evangelos Foutras a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
>
> wrote:
> > I am preparing an update of python-matplotlib to version 1.0.1. This
> > package supports multiple backends for rendering graphics and plotting
> > windows. So far, our
Am 08.01.2011 01:28, schrieb Aaron Bull Schaefer:
> Fellow Trusted Users,
>
> After almost 4 years of being a TU, I've had less and less time to
> dedicate toward maintaining my packages, and so I think it's finally
> time for me to step down. Arch users definitely deserve a better
> response time
Xyne writes:
> The voting period has begun. TUs, please vote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=45
Both the patch and the wiki page contain the following typo. I'll quote
From the patch.
+ The proposal is rejected if EITHER
+
+
+
Hi,
I'd like to know how to rename an AUR package. In this case, I must
rename gplanarity to gplanarity-svn.
Is it possible ? Can I do it or does anyone else have to do it ?
Or shoud I create a new package ? In this case, should the old one be
removed ?
I didn't find anything about that case
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Sebastien Duthil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know how to rename an AUR package. In this case, I must rename
> gplanarity to gplanarity-svn.
> Is it possible ? Can I do it or does anyone else have to do it ?
> Or shoud I create a new package ? In this case, should
15/01/2011 02:02, Brad Fanella :
As of now, you cannot rename packages. If you simply upload a new one,
I can delete the old package for you.:-)
I uploaded the new package. If you could remove the "gplanarity"
package, it would be great. Thanks !
By the way, I commented the package to say that
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Sebastien Duthil wrote:
> 15/01/2011 02:02, Brad Fanella :
>>
>> As of now, you cannot rename packages. If you simply upload a new one,
>> I can delete the old package for you.:-)
>
> I uploaded the new package. If you could remove the "gplanarity" package, it
> wo
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:20:18 +0100
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0100, speps wrote:
> > I have also sent him an e-mail without responses
>
> You added an AUR comment just two days ago. How long did you wait for a
> response to your mail? Two days are definitely too
27 matches
Mail list logo
