Re: [aur-general] lib32-portaudio forgotten... :'(

2011-02-03 Thread rafael ff1
Thanks, Fixed! 2011/2/3 Evangelos Foutras > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order > to > > install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be > > missing, busy, in outer space or wha

Re: [aur-general] lib32-portaudio forgotten... :'(

2011-02-03 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, rafael ff1 wrote: > I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order to > install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but  the maintainer seems to be > missing, busy, in outer space or whatever and doesn't reply requests in > comments or email

Re: [aur-general] [community], [unsupported] and AUR

2011-02-03 Thread Ray Rashif
On 3 February 2011 11:14, Xyne wrote: > Hi, > > A post on the forum[1] brought my attention to the Official Repositories wiki > page[2]. > > A recent note by Louipc states: "Technically, both the [community] and > [unsupported] repos make up the AUR.". > > Is this really still true? The AUR websit

[aur-general] lib32-portaudio forgotten... :'(

2011-02-03 Thread rafael ff1
Hi all, I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order to install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be missing, busy, in outer space or whatever and doesn't reply requests in comments or emails. And I already have the PKGBUILD ready for it!

Re: [aur-general] Add pyopencl to [community]

2011-02-03 Thread Ray Rashif
On 4 February 2011 04:21, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Thursday 03 February 2011 13:49:26 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: >> * Add pyopencl to [community] (I will use a better name, something like >> python2-pyopencl) > python2-opencl sounds better IMHO. It's all good but one thing: there either needs

Re: [aur-general] Unactive user

2011-02-03 Thread György Balló
2011/2/3 François Boulogne : > Another point: [3] is marked as a dev package (which is the last stable > version) and [4] is titled as a stable version which is out of date. I don't think that the version 2.91.2 of Gwibber is a stable release. Gwibber usually follows GNOME's, Ubuntu's release circ

Re: [aur-general] Add pyopencl to [community]

2011-02-03 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kirill Churin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault > wrote: > >> Dear Tus, >> >> I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in >> AUR and it has 14 votes. >> >> Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL li

Re: [aur-general] Add pyopencl to [community]

2011-02-03 Thread Kirill Churin
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > Dear Tus, > > I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in > AUR and it has 14 votes. > > Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL library, provided by either > nvidia-utils or amdstream [2]) and a

[aur-general] Unactive user

2011-02-03 Thread François Boulogne
Hello, I found that the package [1] is out of date and in the mean time, I realized the maintainer is not really active. I sent him an email several days ago, no answer. I think some packages should be removed, especially beta ones, or packages like [2] (the title does not respect the aur policy)

Re: [aur-general] Add pyopencl to [community]

2011-02-03 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday 03 February 2011 13:49:26 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > * Add pyopencl to [community] (I will use a better name, something like > python2-pyopencl) python2-opencl sounds better IMHO. -- Andrea

Re: [aur-general] Add pyopencl to [community]

2011-02-03 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 02/03/2011 08:49 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: Dear Tus, I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in AUR and it has 14 votes. Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL library, provided by either nvidia-utils or amdstream [2]) and a package that provide

[aur-general] Add pyopencl to [community]

2011-02-03 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Dear Tus, I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in AUR and it has 14 votes. Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL library, provided by either nvidia-utils or amdstream [2]) and a package that provides OpenCL C/C++ headers. Here is my plan : * Add

[aur-general] 2 packages for Lyx 2.0

2011-02-03 Thread Bernardo Barros
Lyx beta3 has two packages in AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37964 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45798 no idea which did it better. :-)

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-02-03 Thread Jan Steffens
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Martin Peres wrote: > This one is strange: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33092 gold-cvs > Heftig, why do you want to keep this package for reference? In case someone wants to build gold from CVS again.