On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Martin Peres martin.pe...@free.fr wrote:
This one is strange:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33092 gold-cvs
Heftig, why do you want to keep this package for reference?
In case someone wants to build gold from CVS again.
Lyx beta3 has two packages in AUR:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37964
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45798
no idea which did it better. :-)
Dear Tus,
I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in
AUR and it has 14 votes.
Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL library, provided by either
nvidia-utils or amdstream [2]) and a package that provides OpenCL C/C++
headers.
Here is my plan :
*
On 02/03/2011 08:49 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
Dear Tus,
I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in
AUR and it has 14 votes.
Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL library, provided by either
nvidia-utils or amdstream [2]) and a package that
Hello,
I found that the package [1] is out of date and in the mean time, I
realized the maintainer is not really active. I sent him an email
several days ago, no answer.
I think some packages should be removed, especially beta ones, or
packages like [2] (the title does not respect the aur
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Dear Tus,
I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in
AUR and it has 14 votes.
Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL library, provided by either
nvidia-utils or
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kirill Churin reflex...@reflexing.ru wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Dear Tus,
I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in
AUR and it has 14 votes.
Pyopencl depends,
2011/2/3 François Boulogne boulogn...@gmail.com:
Another point: [3] is marked as a dev package (which is the last stable
version) and [4] is titled as a stable version which is out of date.
I don't think that the version 2.91.2 of Gwibber is a stable release.
Gwibber usually follows GNOME's,
On 4 February 2011 04:21, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 13:49:26 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
* Add pyopencl to [community] (I will use a better name, something like
python2-pyopencl)
python2-opencl sounds better IMHO.
It's all good but one thing:
Hi all,
I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order to
install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be
missing, busy, in outer space or whatever and doesn't reply requests in
comments or emails. And I already have the PKGBUILD ready for it!
On 3 February 2011 11:14, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Hi,
A post on the forum[1] brought my attention to the Official Repositories wiki
page[2].
A recent note by Louipc states: Technically, both the [community] and
[unsupported] repos make up the AUR..
Is this really still true? The AUR
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order to
install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be
missing, busy, in outer space or whatever and doesn't reply requests in
Thanks, Fixed!
2011/2/3 Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order
to
install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be
13 matches
Mail list logo
