Just a small note that we will move poppler rebuilds right after the
MySQL move.
So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is
available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734.
Can somebody with community access test it and fix the bug?
-Andy
On 02/05/2011 10:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is
available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734.
That fix you mentioned is already applied in the current package.
I tried a couple of different patches a few days ago.
On 02/05/2011 10:32 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On 02/05/2011 10:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is
available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734.
That fix you mentioned is already applied in the current package.
I tried a
On 02/05/2011 02:50 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On 02/05/2011 10:32 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On 02/05/2011 10:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is
available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734.
That fix you mentioned is
I mean, if they provide the same thing, there should be just one. Right?
2011/2/3 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com:
Lyx beta3 has two packages in AUR:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37964
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45798
no idea which did it better. :-)
I agree. Did you try to contact both of them, or leave a message on the AUR
?
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Bernardo Barros
bernardobarr...@gmail.comwrote:
I mean, if they provide the same thing, there should be just one. Right?
2011/2/3 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com:
Lyx
On Thursday 03 February 2011 05:39:52 Heiko Baums wrote:
Every binary repo is called something in square brackets like [core],
[extra], [community] etc., which are activated or deactivated
in /etc/pacman.conf, but there is no repo [unsupported]. And at least I
haven't found any reference on
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second class source of
packages compared to the official repos. Not surprising, of course, so
many packages have problems. This is also
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second class source of
packages compared to the official repos.
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
First of all remove that my before packages, that's a problem, some
maintainers thinks that they're owners of the PKGBUILD, and isn't like
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
Greg, You have a valid point, personally I have always asked the maintainer
of a package for objections before moving a package into community. I also
want to continue to express my deep gratitude for the packagers who
contribute
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
Greg, You have a valid point, personally I have always asked the
maintainer
of a package for objections before moving a package into community. I
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 10:32 +0100, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On 02/05/2011 10:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is
available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734.
That fix you mentioned is already applied in the current
On 02/05/2011 08:31 PM, Gergely Imreh wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
I moved a lot of packages from AUR in community/extra and every time i
did sent a thank you note. From that amount of messages i sent,
It would be technologically helpful if moving a package to Community (or
just deleting it from the AUR) did not consign its AUR comments to the
eternal bit bucket in the sky. At any rate, I often wish I could see
what was on the AUR page just before it was moved.
((if you want an example::
Hi, fellow Archers,
I feel a need to express my support to the opinion stated by Greg Imreh and
Thomas Hatch. There is an unique relation between the contributor/maintainer
and
the PKGBUILD. This relation calls for respect. So please TUs/devs act as people
and show it by letting first the
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
Greg, You have a valid point, personally I have always asked the
I had the same problem a few weeks ago, when the polipo package I was
maintaining was moved to [Community] without any notice. I got aware of
this when yaourt told me my version of polipo was not the same as in the
repos… imagine my surprise when I didn't find my package on AUR anymore.
Not
On 6 February 2011 02:31, Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
This has come up a couple of times before, and we all know it is very
wrong to move a package from [unsupported]
Excerpts from masutu's message of 2011-02-04 18:22:35 +0100:
Hi TUs,
can you please delete dino-git (
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33598)? I'm the maintainer of this
package and want it to be deleted because
a) PKGBUILD is broken, outdated and i can't get current git versions to
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 21:00 +0100, Maxime Wack wrote:
I had the same problem a few weeks ago, when the polipo package I was
maintaining was moved to [Community] without any notice. I got aware of
this when yaourt told me my version of polipo was not the same as in the
repos… imagine my
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.comwrote:
Excerpts from masutu's message of 2011-02-04 18:22:35 +0100:
Hi TUs,
can you please delete dino-git (
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33598)? I'm the maintainer of
this
package and want it to be
Le 5 février 2011 13:45:20, Thomas S Hatch a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second
Gergely Imreh wrote:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
My impression is that AUR is treated as a second class source of
packages compared to the official repos. Not surprising, of course, so
many packages have
I just adopted and updated pngout-static, but there are some additional
pngout-static packages available that are old, outdated, and orphaned.
Nobody cares about these and nothing depends on them either.
pngout-static-athlon
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38727
pngout-static-pentium4
2011/2/6 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org:
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
First of all remove that my before packages, that's a problem, some
maintainers thinks that
2011/2/5 Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com:
To Angel Velasquez: the nature of the relation is not like an ownership, but
more like an authorship. Is it that much to show your respect to the author by
a polite question? After all we are people, not mindless machines nor animals.
Hi Nicky,
This is
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 21:00:32 +0100
Maxime Wack maximew...@free.fr wrote:
I had the same problem a few weeks ago, when the polipo package I
was maintaining was moved to [Community] without any notice. I got
aware of this when yaourt told me my version of polipo was not the
same as in the
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
2011/2/6 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org:
2011/2/5 Gergely Imreh imr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the
process feels a little uneasy to me.
First of all remove that my before packages, that's
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Lou l...@fakeoutdoorsman.com wrote:
I just adopted and updated pngout-static, but there are some additional
pngout-static packages available that are old, outdated, and orphaned.
Nobody cares about these and nothing depends on them either.
pngout-static-athlon
Dear Arch Users/Dev/TUs,
I read some times ago on this mailing list words about shortly
introducing new cool packages. I'm starting.
From some times now, I discovered the power of a kernel embeded tools
named perf, which is really useful to get information about your
kernel performances and hunt
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 23:31:55 +0200
Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Lou l...@fakeoutdoorsman.com wrote:
I just adopted and updated pngout-static, but there are some
additional pngout-static packages available that are old, outdated,
and orphaned.
Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Hilton Medeiros a écrit :
Now, that is outrageous. Stealing your package is already a very nasty
thing to do, but not replying to your email is unforgivable!
From today onwards we shall call him: Jelle, the Soulless.
Wow, I didn't expect to be trolled on
Please orphan gnome-paint package [1], because it's outdated for a
while, and my e-mail to the maintainer was rejected (the address is
not exists).
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32487
--
City-busz
On 02/05/2011 11:49 PM, György Balló wrote:
Please orphan gnome-paint package [1], because it's outdated for a
while, and my e-mail to the maintainer was rejected (the address is
not exists).
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32487
--
City-busz
done
--
Ionuț
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Maxime Wack maximew...@free.fr wrote:
Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Hilton Medeiros a écrit :
Now, that is outrageous. Stealing your package is already a very nasty
thing to do, but not replying to your email is unforgivable!
From today onwards we shall call
Hi Angel,
This is opensource world dude, can you see it?, so forget those
autorship and license of those PKGBUILD, plus, in many cases, many
of the packages went from one people to another. Btw I don't know why
people refers to packages when we are talking about aurballs
containing PKGBUILD,
On 6 February 2011 03:35, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
I moved a lot of packages from AUR in community/extra and every time i did
sent a thank you note. From that amount of messages i sent, only once i
got a reply. ONCE.
Should i be dissapointed? I guess yes. I am? No.
No need. The
On 6 February 2011 06:01, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that Hilton was trolling you Maxime, just poking a little fun
at Jelle.
He was so engrossed with moving a package (think about the excitement
he must have had) that he forgot about the formalities involved.
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote:
Dear Arch Users/Dev/TUs,
I read some times ago on this mailing list words about shortly
introducing new cool packages. I'm starting.
It is indeed a great idea.
From some times now, I discovered the power of a kernel embeded
I have contributed a few PKGBUILDs to AUR. I do it because I enjoy it
-- all I ask is for is recognition. Yes, this is an open source
project and it is implicit that the work can and (hopefully) be
adopted and improved. But recognition of each person who contributed
should be maintained.
I am
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
I apologize for taking your package without emailing or notifiying you and
more I feel bad for not replying to your email. And now i am ashamed on the
mailing list,
I won't forget to mail the next time I adopt packages
I always send the maintainer a 'thank you' afterwards telling them that I've
moved their package to [community] and asking them if they have any specific
advise about the package. My personal opinion is that it is not necessary to
ask beforehand when moving a package simply because in my
I'll just add here that I used to use moving packages to [community] as
a TU recruitment ground. If the package I wanted to move to [community]
was obviously well maintained, I usually offered to sponsor the
maintainer to be a TU when I let them know I was going to move their
package. I
Can someone please delete efibootmgr
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11899 . It was moved into
'extra' repo http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/efibootmgr/
by tpowa about 2 days back. Thanks in advance.
- Keshav
On 06.02.2011 07:19, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
Can someone please delete efibootmgr
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11899 . It was moved into
'extra' repo http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/efibootmgr/
by tpowa about 2 days back. Thanks in advance.
- Keshav
I destroyed it with
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:51, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
On 06.02.2011 07:19, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
Can someone please delete efibootmgr
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11899 . It was moved into
'extra' repo http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/efibootmgr/
by
On 06.02.2011 07:23, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:51, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
On 06.02.2011 07:19, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
Can someone please delete efibootmgr
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11899 . It was moved into
'extra' repo
I tried adopted this package (kernel26-yi)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37895
But when I tried to upload an updated PKGBUILD. I got rejected with
Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed
I used makepkg --source to generate a file named
kernel26-yi-2.6.37-1.src.tar.gz.
Why am
50 matches
Mail list logo
