Re: [aur-general] Please delete gnome-shell

2011-03-11 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 21:10 -0700, jwbirdsong wrote: > On 03/11/2011 09:02 PM, helq alluqa wrote: > > 2011/3/11 jwbirdsong > > > >> On 03/11/2011 08:06 PM, helq alluqa wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> please delete the obsolete gnome-shell package from AUR [is in > >>> gnome-unstable]: > >>> > >>> ht

Re: [aur-general] Please delete gnome-shell

2011-03-11 Thread jwbirdsong
On 03/11/2011 09:02 PM, helq alluqa wrote: > 2011/3/11 jwbirdsong > >> On 03/11/2011 08:06 PM, helq alluqa wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> please delete the obsolete gnome-shell package from AUR [is in >>> gnome-unstable]: >>> >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31102 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Elkin >>

Re: [aur-general] Please delete gnome-shell

2011-03-11 Thread helq alluqa
2011/3/11 jwbirdsong > On 03/11/2011 08:06 PM, helq alluqa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please delete the obsolete gnome-shell package from AUR [is in > > gnome-unstable]: > > > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31102 > > > > Thanks, > > Elkin > > > > I'd suggest to leave it there for a while

Re: [aur-general] Please delete gnome-shell

2011-03-11 Thread jwbirdsong
On 03/11/2011 08:06 PM, helq alluqa wrote: > Hi, > > please delete the obsolete gnome-shell package from AUR [is in > gnome-unstable]: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31102 > > Thanks, > Elkin > I'd suggest to leave it there for a while longer. (ASSuming it builds as is) As ioni

[aur-general] Please delete gnome-shell

2011-03-11 Thread helq alluqa
Hi, please delete the obsolete gnome-shell package from AUR [is in gnome-unstable]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31102 Thanks, Elkin

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.1

2011-03-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:25:02PM +0100, Thomas Jost wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:16:53 -0500, Adam Weiss wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 13:54, Lukas Fleischer > > wrote: > > > That seems to happen with WebKit only. Any Safari/Chrom{e,ium} user > > > around that is willing to point out t

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 11.03.2011 17:41, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > >> It looks like it is much easier to teach insmod gzip. If I see this > >> right, it is actually trivial, although I did not try. module-init-tools > >> didn't have a git commit for 9 months, s

Re: [aur-general] Please delete hledger-full

2011-03-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.03.2011 16:07, schrieb Peter Simons: > Hi, > > please delete the obsolete hledger-full package from AUR: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40768 > > Thanks, > Peter > > Hello, why is this PKGBUILD obsolete? Did you inform the current maintainer by e-mail? Regards Stefan

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 11.03.2011 17:41, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: >> It looks like it is much easier to teach insmod gzip. If I see this >> right, it is actually trivial, although I did not try. module-init-tools >> didn't have a git commit for 9 months, so I don't know how fast they >> would accept a patch. >> >> > Ye

Re: [aur-general] Please delete duplicate Haskell packages from AUR

2011-03-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.03.2011 15:49, schrieb Peter Simons: > Hi, > > the following packages are published in both AUR and [extra]: > > haskell-fgl http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20937 > haskell-glut http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17899 > haskell-openglhttp://a

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 11.03.2011 16:55, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Thomas Bächler >wrote: > > > >> Am 11.03.2011 00:45, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > >>> Wait, you are saying that insmod will load gzipped mods if compiled > >>> d

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 11.03.2011 16:55, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 11.03.2011 00:45, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: >>> Wait, you are saying that insmod will load gzipped mods if compiled >>> differently? >>> >> >> No. depmod, modinfo and modprobe can do it, ins

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 11.03.2011 00:45, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > > Wait, you are saying that insmod will load gzipped mods if compiled > > differently? > > > > No. depmod, modinfo and modprobe can do it, insmod can't. > > Thanks! Unfortunately I had to fix it

[aur-general] Please delete hledger-full

2011-03-11 Thread Peter Simons
Hi, please delete the obsolete hledger-full package from AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40768 Thanks, Peter

[aur-general] Please delete duplicate Haskell packages from AUR

2011-03-11 Thread Peter Simons
Hi, the following packages are published in both AUR and [extra]: haskell-fgl http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20937 haskell-glut http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17899 haskell-openglhttp://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17677 haskell-platform

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 11.03.2011 00:45, schrieb Thomas S Hatch: > Wait, you are saying that insmod will load gzipped mods if compiled > differently? > No. depmod, modinfo and modprobe can do it, insmod can't. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature