[aur-general] removal of python3-pyopengl

2011-07-09 Thread Michael Schubert
Hi TUs, please remove python3-pyopengl [1]. It is out of date, orphaned, and I maintain the proper package python-pyopengl. Thanks. Michael [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45322

[aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Seblu
Package: ntpdate Reason: Already in ntp Link: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19145 -- SĂ©bastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Bartek Piotrowski
Ex Falso is already in Quod Libet and this is not reason to remove it from AUR. Bartek Piotrowski

Re: [aur-general] removal of python3-pyopengl

2011-07-09 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 9 July 2011 15:57, Michael Schubert mschu@gmail.com wrote: Hi TUs, please remove python3-pyopengl [1]. It is out of date, orphaned, and I maintain the proper package python-pyopengl. Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Bartek Piotrowski barthal...@gmail.com wrote: Ex Falso is already in Quod Libet and this is not reason to remove it from AUR. Beginning of the sentence is in english? i would add package is: - orphan - out-of-date since febrary 2011 - not update since april

[aur-general] [removal request] luakit-noscript-git

2011-07-09 Thread Uli Armbruster
Please remove my package luakit-noscript-git. It was merged into the develop branch which is used in the package luakit-git. I only created this package to make it easier for users to test this plugin. You can find it here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50387

Re: [aur-general] [removal request] luakit-noscript-git

2011-07-09 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 06:27:21PM +0200, Uli Armbruster wrote: Please remove my package luakit-noscript-git. It was merged into the develop branch which is used in the package luakit-git. I only created this package to make it easier for users to test this plugin. You can find it here

Re: [aur-general] [deletion request] Please delete my package mkvtoolnix-gtk and mkvtoolnix-nogui

2011-07-09 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Uli Armbruster uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com [22.06.2011 13:33]: * Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de [22.06.2011 13:22]: Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:04 +0200 schrieb Uli Armbruster uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com: Here's the link https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49992 I

[aur-general] [deletion request] streetview-explorer

2011-07-09 Thread Uli Armbruster
And another one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49968 There's a package called streetview-explorer-svn which fits better, because this application is only provided as a svn version, so my package (which indicated to be a stable release according to the name, but there won't be a

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Bartek Piotrowski
2011/7/9 Seblu se...@seblu.net: Beginning of the sentence is in english? Ex Falso[1] in AUR. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19030

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Bartek Piotrowski barthal...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/9 Seblu se...@seblu.net: Beginning of the sentence is in english? Ex Falso[1] in AUR. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19030 I wanted to adopt ntpdate to update it, but i'm believe package

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread jesse jaara
Upsated some might find the implementation in AUR more appealing than the one in repo. The is nothing that prevents people from uploading stuff to AUR just cuz it has same features as the repo package. Like example there are/were many -pulse packases in aur that simply add pulse support to the

Re: [aur-general] [deletion request] streetview-explorer

2011-07-09 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 9 July 2011 19:32, Uli Armbruster uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com wrote: And another one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49968 There's a package called streetview-explorer-svn which fits better, because this application is only provided as a svn version, so my package (which

Re: [aur-general] [deletion request] Please delete my package mkvtoolnix-gtk and mkvtoolnix-nogui

2011-07-09 Thread Eric BĂ©langer
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Uli Armbruster uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com wrote: * Uli Armbruster uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com [22.06.2011 13:33]: * Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de [22.06.2011 13:22]: Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:04 +0200 schrieb Uli Armbruster

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:20 PM, jesse jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Upsated some might find the implementation in AUR more appealing than the one in repo. The is nothing that prevents people from uploading stuff to AUR just cuz it has same features as the repo package. No, us. AUR is not a

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Baptiste
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Seblu wrote: On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Bartek Piotrowski barthal...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/9 Seblu se...@seblu.net: Beginning of the sentence is in english? Ex Falso[1] in AUR. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19030 I

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-07-09 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Baptiste zersto...@free.fr wrote: On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Seblu wrote: On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Bartek Piotrowski barthal...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/9 Seblu se...@seblu.net: Beginning of the sentence is in english? Ex Falso[1] in