Re: [aur-general] joystick - request for removal

Hi, > Is including provides=('joystick') an idea for linuxconsole? Wasn't aware about this package. Added joystick package to provides/replaces in linuxconsole. Andrzej.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-bdwgc

Ah, ok sorry. Thanks. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Hi, > > Removed mingw32-bdwgc and mingw32-lcms1, thanks for reporting. > Please include links to the packages next time. > > -- > Sincerely, >  Alexander Rødseth >  Arch Linux Trusted User >  (xyproto on IRC, tront

Re: [aur-general] for queueRAM -- about perForce software issues

Hi, If the hash sum test fails, it's a nice check and reminder if anything changed since the PKGBUILD was last looked at. Unless Perforce releases new versions very often, it may be a good idea that the PKGBUILD keeps failing when the source changes, so that it gets reviewed again. If there are n

Re: [aur-general] joystick - request for removal

Hi, Removed joystick. Thanks for reporting. Is including provides=('joystick') an idea for linuxconsole? -- Best regards,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Package removal

Hi, Removed. Thanks. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-bdwgc

Hi, Removed mingw32-bdwgc and mingw32-lcms1, thanks for reporting. Please include links to the packages next time. -- Sincerely,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] for queueRAM -- about perForce software issues

Thanks for you reply! I'll try to implement another version of PKGBUILD to fullfill my needs. The script will be pasted on the aur pages as soon as possible after finished. On 2012-02-15 19:58:05, Matthew Monaco wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:58:05 -0700 > From: Matthew Monaco > To: aur-gen

Re: [aur-general] for queueRAM -- about perForce software issues

On 02/15/2012 07:24 PM, goodme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, queueRAM, I found the p4/p4v packages in AUR were maintained by you. Here is something about them: (1) due to perforce.com do not provide version info in the download filename, the download file will alwayse failed to pa

[aur-general] for queueRAM -- about perForce software issues

Hi, queueRAM, I found the p4/p4v packages in AUR were maintained by you. Here is something about them: (1) due to perforce.com do not provide version info in the download filename, the download file will alwayse failed to pass md5 checksum tesing whenever the company r

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-bdwgc

I have since renamed this package to mingw32-gc to reduce confusion, in comparison to the packages gc and lib32-gc

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-lcms1

I've since renamed and resubmitted this as mingw32-lcms, and resubmitted version 2.3 as mingw32-lcms2. mingw32-lcms1 is no longer needed.

[aur-general] Package removal

Pls remove adesklet-pacmansentry 0.0.6-2 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18336). I was the maintainer of this package. The adesklet project is dead http://adesklets.sourceforge.net/index.html Mario

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: aurorasim-git and tao-framework

Thanks again. 2012/2/15 Bartłomiej Piotrowski : > On 02/15/2012 12:18 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: >>  Please delete 'aurorasim-git' and 'tao-framework' AUR packages >> These packages are two of my mistakes. The first one, aurorasim-git, >> was submitted when I was still a newbie last summer and it was

Re: [aur-general] Adopt/orphan request: mingw32-gettext

Thanks! 2012/2/15 Bartłomiej Piotrowski : > On 02/15/2012 01:43 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: >> I would like to request mingw32-gettext be orphaned. The provided >> email address of the maintainer seems to be no longer valid, as >> sending a notice to him resulted in a failure delivery notice in my >> i

[aur-general] joystick - request for removal

please remove joystick pkgbuild: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48504 reason: linuxconsole (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55442) made this pkgbuild obsoleted thank you, jose

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

On 02/15/2012 10:24 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: Hi, Removed. Thanks. Wow, that was fast! Thanks. :) Smith

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: vulture-nethack

Hi, Merged+deleted "vulture-nethack" into "vulture". Thanks for reporting. -- Sincerely,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

[aur-general] Removal request: vulture-nethack

The package vulture-nethack [1] doesn't run and can't be built anymore since the latest libpng update. The maintainer created a new package vulture [2] which is patched for the new libpng and installs the full upstream package containing the variants for nethack, slashem and unnethack, and orphane

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

Hi, Removed. Thanks. -- Best regards,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

[aur-general] Package removal request

Hi, Please remove the following packages of mine: thailatex-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28852 ttf-thai-latex: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54664 ttf-thai-latex have been replaced by ttf-latex-tlwg and I no longer planned to maintain thailatex-svn. Thank you,

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: aurorasim-git and tao-framework

On 02/15/2012 12:18 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: > Please delete 'aurorasim-git' and 'tao-framework' AUR packages > These packages are two of my mistakes. The first one, aurorasim-git, > was submitted when I was still a newbie last summer and it was not > tested before submission. Even after testing it

Re: [aur-general] Adopt/orphan request: mingw32-gettext

On 02/15/2012 01:43 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: > I would like to request mingw32-gettext be orphaned. The provided > email address of the maintainer seems to be no longer valid, as > sending a notice to him resulted in a failure delivery notice in my > inbox, and mingw32-gettext, although up to date, i

Re: [aur-general] Remove request:airdrop-ng, airgraph-ng and aircrack-ptw

On 02/15/2012 05:56 AM, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote: > airdrop-ng and airgraph-ng is duplicated with aircrack-ng-scripts in > community. > > aircrack-ptw has been included into aircrack-ng since version 0.9, and > the source link in PKGBUILD has down. > > airdrop-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packa

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Package rename requests: mingw32-lcms1 and mingw32-lcms

Alright. That would be me, so I'll get on that in the morning and send a removal request following submission. Thanks On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Hi, > > We can currently only delete (or delete+merge), not rename. > If the maintainer of mingw32-lcms resubmits the

Re: [aur-general] Package rename requests: mingw32-lcms1 and mingw32-lcms

Hi, We can currently only delete (or delete+merge), not rename. If the maintainer of mingw32-lcms resubmits the package as mingw32-lcms2, we can then delete+merge mingw32-lcms1 into mingw32-lcms. -- Sincerely,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

[aur-general] Package rename requests: mingw32-lcms1 and mingw32-lcms

I am hoping to get the two mentioned packages renamed to fit naming conventions for packages. mingw32-lcms1 -> mingw32-lcms mingw32-lcms -> mingw32-lcms2 Renaming these that way would make better sense. Thanks.